Luke Brooks

They were saying on 360 last night Tigers may want to offload him and pay some freight. Would he go any good at hooker? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • In attack he could offer value, but he'd be a liability in defence. Maybe off the bench

    • From the figures they were talking (which could be all pure bullshit) for the tigers to get rid of him to another club they would have to pay about half his 2023 salary - $600k was the number provided. Do you think his defence could be improved/adapted to suit dummy half. How would Api Korisau go defending in the halves for example? I'm sure his rate of missed tackles would increase. Brooks is a player that needs a change of scenery 

      • Moses was just as shit and now he is a reliable defender at the Eels. At hooker Brooks will have more support around him. 

        I think he'll make a great hooker, looks to have a nice backpussy.

        • Good grief, this comment escalated real quick. I'll take your word for it Kurupt.

      • He does have speed, and a lefty kick from dummy half is always handy.

        • No way Brett. You're kidding signing a player who can't defend at hooker. 

          • I didn't say we should sign him Chief, I merely pointed out his good qualities. 

          • How do you know he can't defend at hooker?

            • Coz I've watched him tackle. You should watch him too that way you'll understand. You don't need to much of a sample size. About 10-15 games should be enough. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"He certainly has Bobbie, I have been a past admirer of PVL and his astuteness, in this area he has shown himself to be complacent and mis reading the room...... My suspicions are he has become over confident and probably tired, unfortunately for him…"
1 minute ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Hoey, That's an excellent point re Crawley.....one of the side benefits of these issues is seeing how the media is manipulated by their masters......its not just sugar you get when sqeezing cane, there is the side benefit of the Rum! Lol
 "
7 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Thanks, Kurupt. It's a fascinating case. The timeline of public / media releases in the footnotes is also an interesting study of framing public narratives."
16 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Thanks, Mitchy. 
It's interesting, Crawley was emphatic on Feb 12 in backing the Eels, labelling Lomax’s case “complete nonsense.”
Since then, there’s been no follow-up column on Lomax despite significant reported developments, including messages…"
17 minutes ago
More…