Luke Brooks

They were saying on 360 last night Tigers may want to offload him and pay some freight. Would he go any good at hooker? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • In attack he could offer value, but he'd be a liability in defence. Maybe off the bench

    • From the figures they were talking (which could be all pure bullshit) for the tigers to get rid of him to another club they would have to pay about half his 2023 salary - $600k was the number provided. Do you think his defence could be improved/adapted to suit dummy half. How would Api Korisau go defending in the halves for example? I'm sure his rate of missed tackles would increase. Brooks is a player that needs a change of scenery 

      • Moses was just as shit and now he is a reliable defender at the Eels. At hooker Brooks will have more support around him. 

        I think he'll make a great hooker, looks to have a nice backpussy.

        • Good grief, this comment escalated real quick. I'll take your word for it Kurupt.

      • He does have speed, and a lefty kick from dummy half is always handy.

        • No way Brett. You're kidding signing a player who can't defend at hooker. 

          • I didn't say we should sign him Chief, I merely pointed out his good qualities. 

          • How do you know he can't defend at hooker?

            • Coz I've watched him tackle. You should watch him too that way you'll understand. You don't need to much of a sample size. About 10-15 games should be enough. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"Daniel Mortimer, 
Restarts are worse than penalities as there is no break in the clock, and no time to reset the defensive line, creating a vicious cycle of momentum and fatigue.
Actually, for most of the Storm v Eels game errors were equal.
Errors…"
5 minutes ago
Rabz S replied to LB's discussion 1eE Modern day Eels team: Utility, no.14
"Thanks mate, it worked."
8 minutes ago
Manuel Dortimer replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"Rubbish.  Have a look at the lopsideed scores the whole round.  Manly had 11 mins straight of possession before Canberra got the ball.  The NRL has called for this type of officiating and many teams were not ready for it.  If you put teams under…"
44 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Fox on Track for Rd 2
"Good news, Storm targeted our unorganised left side really well. Pezet was their first target, once they got him the domino of Kelly and Russell fell quite easily. Although, Storm really got us through the ruck all night as that's where their…"
44 minutes ago
More…