Eels Blogs

Loss of nathan peats not what everyone thinks it is !

Posted by ONLYEELS on May 13, 2016 at 1:30pm

Yes we have lost a tough hooker and yes he is/was one of my fav players, but if you think about it since he has been with parra we have played 61 games he has played just over half with 32 games under his belt for parra.I dont know what we are paying for him but there are players that can play 30 games in 1 season he has only just got that in 2 and half? I think parra have done the right thing by moving him on its sad to say but yeah. Too injury prone and in my eyes hasnt earned the money he got from us.Lol yous can all attack me now but thats just my opinion and if yous think about it, it makes sense..

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

★

Votes: 0

Email me when people reply –

Replies

Snakey - Sack Dylan Brown May 13, 2016 at 1:32pm

Totally agree, we will miss him short term a bit, that goes with the territory but we will be sweet and probably better off long term taking into account injury.
- robert maxwell > Snakey - Sack Dylan Brown May 13, 2016 at 1:38pm
  
  that's the main reason brad Arthur was not going to sign peats for 2017 , and he wanted a upgrade too.
  
  hes a smart guy, and knows $450,000 at the gold coast good money.
robert maxwell May 13, 2016 at 1:35pm

that's the main reason brad Arthur was not going to sign peats for 2017 , and he wanted a upgrade too.

hes a smart guy, and knows $450,000 at the gold coast good money.
robert maxwell May 13, 2016 at 1:38pm

that's the main reason brad Arthur was not going to sign peats for 2017 , and he wanted a upgrade too.

hes a smart guy, and knows $450,000 at the gold coast good money.
robert maxwell May 13, 2016 at 1:40pm

that's the main reason brad Arthur was not going to sign peats for 2017 , and he wanted a upgrade too.

hes a smart guy, and knows $450,000 at the gold coast good money.
- Greg the Griffith Grape Grower > robert maxwell May 13, 2016 at 2:01pm
  
  Thanks to all four of you blokes with the same name.
Kramerica May 13, 2016 at 1:41pm

Agreed ONLY.

it doesn't mean that we are sad to see him go, that we would have liked to see him stay, and are disappointed that we have been forced into making this decision.

But facts are facts.
rozay May 13, 2016 at 1:50pm

I honestly couldn't care less that he has gone I'm probably the only 1 who thinks this but I think degois is better all peats does is tackle he never runs the ball he never picks them up any penalties running at offside players
- HKF > rozay May 13, 2016 at 4:03pm
  
  I have been saying since last season we lose nothing with De Gois in the team over Peats, they both lead the line speed and make a lot of tackles, peats has a slight edge in attack but only just.
hindy May 13, 2016 at 1:51pm

oh for peats sake move on beople.