Loko free to talk to other clubs

Was close to signing with sharks earlier this week but the deal fell through over. 30k. Sharks offered 200k he wanted 230k. It will be a huge mistake if we let him go

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Sauce?
  • Special sauce
  • If true well done BA, at least somebody at our club has their head screwed on and can see the woods from the trees.

  • Our luck we let Loko go and he goers on to have an injury free run to only bite us on the arse down the track.

    You can see the telecrap headline  "  Another ex eel comes back to Haunt Parra"

  • I don't get that cause I remember the warriors wanted him end of last year and they and they offered him $400,000 plus a year,and he stayed with the eels. This story is a gee up.
    • Had Brad Arthur taken over officially as coach when the Warriors made the offer? Loko might want to stay, but Arthur might have a different view altogether and might not see him as part of his future plans.

      I'd like to see what he can do in the backrow with nearly a full season under his belt, his days in the centres are numbered IMO. But surely an unproven, injury prone Loko would find it nearly impossible to get anywhere near a backrow spot, even a bench spot, seeing we have the likes of Santi, Tanginoa, Mossop/Lussick (one of them will be a backrower if they're not playing prop), Terepo and likely a few others. Sharks backrow stocks are choc a block too, so they might have had him earmarked to stay in the centres if the deal had come off.

      If these whispers are true, and BA is willing to cut him loose, I hope its an indication that Parra are finally serious about not wanting to pay big dollars for youngsters on potential alone and end up running around for Wenty taking up valuable cap space.

  • Bs he stated he was parra through and through!!
  • Hey it's ok, we still have Ben Smith.

  • no way we should keep him

     

     

     

     

     

     

    NO WAY KEEP LOKO AT ALL COST

     

     

     

     

     

    • So we should, or shouldn't keep him?
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Coryn Hughes replied to LB's discussion Eels emerge as front runners for Wests Tigers Hooker Tallyn Da Silva
"LB your dismissing my point here what we have to establish round our roster is a competitive edge..Signing of a 20 yr old position regardless should have to compete for a position not just walk into it.
Smith doesn't have to be the future but anyone…"
6 minutes ago
iamnot replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Andddd another signing goes by the wayside
"I'd be surprised if Brad Arthur isn't installed as coach at Manly sometime soon. "
16 minutes ago
Bup replied to Poppa's discussion Signing Players, the right price and what we are prepared to pay.
"The thing about signing Da Silva you'll know what we're are doing around a 6.
If your replacing Brown with an established 6 you don't need Tallyn , Smith doesn't over call his halves , is great defensively , currently lacks a probing running game…"
29 minutes ago
RB replied to Poppa's discussion Signing Players, the right price and what we are prepared to pay.
"The actually amount isn't the most important thing. It's the amount of years. You want to lock down the best young players for aslong as possible and reap the rewards at the back end. And unfortunately as we have done, you don't want to sign players…"
30 minutes ago
More…