JWH FREE TO PLAY
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Good old karma, it can be a real bitch. I don't mind watching Gould's world crash and burn. Galvin will develop into a good player, but at the moment he's like a spanner in the works."
"Poppa you basically discredited Neil Camptons article on Blaize because it came from an ABC source with out even reading it.. A 5 year old would probably absorb any information as part of his growing process. When we become adults? we probably have…"
"Maybe we should ask AI for an opinion on Blaize? Cheers "
"Primary source? Pops . Probably someone else's opinion who you think has some merit? Others seem to share that opinion as well .I think anyone who can make it into a sport at an elite first grade level deserves some respect. They certainly have a…"
Replies
x2
Based on this case and the W Chambers case V Manly, I have no doubt Evans will play now.
Yer mate got off, Kane Evans is using the same defence council. He is up in a hours time there saying. Canberra bloke is up now
Cheers for the update Shawny
Yer sorry think he’s using the same as the Canberra bloke now, and thanks for the useful information as well
canberra lost there case...there coach is a joke supporting the crabby pom..
Thank you for updates . We need him .
Agree, but why are we only going for a down grade? JWH tackled looked far worse than Evans.
Judiciary is more inclined to accept a downgrade. You're not arguing that your client didn't make contact with the head, just that it's not worth a grade two.
Which tackle was worse in your opinion Super? Just interested in your opinion. Either way, it is just ridiculous that players are now expected to miraculously pull out of tackles of smaller or falling players.
Kane’s 1st point of contact is the shoulder, a grade 2 is rediculous. Who knows what the judiciary will do but missing a final for a head high tackle which is a secondary impact is laughable.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next