Junior and Marata apparently cleared

Update: Marata and Junior officially fined. Free to play this week.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Ray Hadley just said the same thing on 2GB just now that they will both receive monetary fines and no suspension

  • OMG sanity prevailed!!!😮 💃🏽🥳🥳🥳

    Truly it is completely fair!

    stick that up ya Brandy!!!

  • This reply was deleted.
    • This reply was deleted.
      • Yes they will be. Yes we will be. Gonna be intense...we can do intense.

        think we were far from our best yesterday too maybe thinking about next week.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • that’s how it seemed in Ivan’s last presser too Mick. Shellshocked.

          they are a great side but they are young...like the  baby Eels perhaps? 

          Moses needs to continue and Dylan to step up which I’m sure he will for next week and I think we can.

          • This reply was deleted.
            • we will need to up the intensity, out of control front load our efforts and it will be a good match up🤞

              so glad we gave some  a rest, esp since we got a bit bashed up yesterday.

          • Run Mitch run

      • 100% agree

  • I hope that is corrct Super, as I just put a post in on the finals week blog, regarding the so called shoulder charge, I really find it wierd as to the definition and the way Jnr made that tackle, also I have not seen the Marata one either.

    If one compares Jnr's tackle that is in question, I would say that similar tackles are made in nearly every set of six that involve forwards. The so called hit by Jnr was nothing compared to some others in that game from both sides.

    • Two journos, one employed by NRL.com have now reported they'll only be facing fines.

      Junior probably survives due to not being first to make contact. Marata's hit was late, but not high and he wrapped his arms.

  • Great news, we would get done without Jr. I'm guessing Waqa missed out on a charge altogether

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Randy Handlinger replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"I totally agree, but they were arrogant...they were sure we would buckle.
Not Today Satan"
19 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Yep Badger, that sounds about right. If the Eels hold Zac's legal registered rights 2006-2008 to play NRL, then the Storm contract would be considered invalid as it goes against the strict conditions of the Eels release contract.
If the court was to…"
38 minutes ago
KENDOZA replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"We do anyway"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Members Forum 2026 Recap: Our Club is in Great Hands
"Only thing I'll say to this is having landed Galvin it aligns more to the Moses prime timeline and it's a like for like swap for DB.
Adaptive yes I completely agree as soon as that fell through the messaging changes and the club pivots."
2 hours ago
More…