Junior and Marata apparently cleared

Update: Marata and Junior officially fined. Free to play this week.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Ray Hadley just said the same thing on 2GB just now that they will both receive monetary fines and no suspension

  • OMG sanity prevailed!!!😮 💃🏽🥳🥳🥳

    Truly it is completely fair!

    stick that up ya Brandy!!!

  • This reply was deleted.
    • This reply was deleted.
      • Yes they will be. Yes we will be. Gonna be intense...we can do intense.

        think we were far from our best yesterday too maybe thinking about next week.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • that’s how it seemed in Ivan’s last presser too Mick. Shellshocked.

          they are a great side but they are young...like the  baby Eels perhaps? 

          Moses needs to continue and Dylan to step up which I’m sure he will for next week and I think we can.

          • This reply was deleted.
            • we will need to up the intensity, out of control front load our efforts and it will be a good match up🤞

              so glad we gave some  a rest, esp since we got a bit bashed up yesterday.

          • Run Mitch run

      • 100% agree

  • I hope that is corrct Super, as I just put a post in on the finals week blog, regarding the so called shoulder charge, I really find it wierd as to the definition and the way Jnr made that tackle, also I have not seen the Marata one either.

    If one compares Jnr's tackle that is in question, I would say that similar tackles are made in nearly every set of six that involve forwards. The so called hit by Jnr was nothing compared to some others in that game from both sides.

    • Two journos, one employed by NRL.com have now reported they'll only be facing fines.

      Junior probably survives due to not being first to make contact. Marata's hit was late, but not high and he wrapped his arms.

  • Great news, we would get done without Jr. I'm guessing Waqa missed out on a charge altogether

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Clintorian replied to Charbs's discussion Storm to face hefty bill if star loses Eels court fight
"How good would it be if the Storm lose the case, and then the NRL consider that part of Storm's salary cap as payment to Lomax 😆"
16 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion SMH Report: Storm, Raiders & Perth Allegedly All Interested In Signing Lomax
"Right so they are getting to the point of hushing up Parra. Chan is ok but I would want a Flegg talent too.
Howarth is a real possibility if Lomax takes his Centre spot. Push for him and take Matto."
20 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Charbs's discussion Storm to face hefty bill if star loses Eels court fight
"The switch to the Storm for 2026 onwards has been reportedly valued at $1 million
What?
The?
Fuck?
How could Melbourne possibly put him on the books for a mil? "TPA's"?"
28 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Johnny Suede's discussion SMH Report: Storm, Raiders & Perth Allegedly All Interested In Signing Lomax
"No, my point is more about Lomax's team saying they had exhausted all the opportunities they had on the table with the other NRL teams that were interested, none were, and the only offer came from Storm. Then they could say Parra are restricting…"
36 minutes ago
More…