Judiciary

Now we all know how it goes, again and again it's one rule for us and another for the favoured clubs. I realise RCG had priors, but does him being suspended for four weeks and Tapau for 3 weeks for a deliberate act with clear intent, pass the pub test?

last night we saw Holmes binned for a hit on Moses with all the talk today and from the cows about Mitch "refereeing" and the contact being with his shoulder. Last year, Jnr copped a week for "great tackle" on A J Brimson. NRL will no doubt just fine Holmes or even let him off completely.12158492859?profile=RESIZE_710x

12158491482?profile=RESIZE_710x

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Reason why Holmes will get off is because NQ are on a roll and want to see them continue. I know it sounds petty but the media are even pushing it saying Holmes should get off.

    Im concerned about Matterson with his record. Plus he will fight it to avoid the fine and get an extra week hahah.

    • Same as Sivo hit IMO. Let's see what the inconsistent judiciary says about this one! Anyone have any thoughts on the Harry Grant kneeing incident? Will he get time off? Fingers crossed he has at least a week off... 

  • Is this a pic of the initial contact or Moses's head whiplashing onto Holmes shoulder after impact?  You would think of it was initial impact with the jaw Moses would never of got up and been stretched off . 

     

    Their was no excuse fonTapau raising  his knee and their was no excuse for RCG dropping his knees onto a opponents back , if you are going to say Tapau's was a deliberate act then same can be said for RCG  because they both had absolutely no excuse for thet both did .

    • Well why was Fifita absolutley fine when Sivo a brute of a man had a swining arm directly to the head? 

      • Having w shoulder hit you flush on the jaw from a player running at full pace is going to have bit more force than a swing arm from a player  who was basically stationary.

  • I was going to make the very same comment re Junior's tackle on AJ Brimson (that it was shoulder to shoulder contact and that Brimson's head making contact with Juniors shoulder was inertia or whiplash). I was told at the time without reservation that fighting it at the judiciary was a waste of time - any contact with the head results in a suspension. Be interesting to see if the cowboys fight it and what the come up with. Also interesting that as with Moses, Brimson was never sent for a head injury assessment.

  • Isn't it the exact same tackle that Sivo got 4 weeks for?

    • Yeah I found it weird the commentary team were like, if it was a head contact Moses would be on the ground and should have been sent for a HIA, yet Sivo's was arguably the same type of tackle and Jojo continued to play and were ok with the sin bin

      • Agenda is strong, it's obvious and over it. Even fans of game are the same.

        Moses and Gutho being unlikeable attributes to that.

        • What is the agenda concerning Parramatta? The NRL don't want them to succeed ? 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Alfred replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Michael Ennis sucking the c** of Dylan Brown
"Oh well got some promising juniors coming through the ranks. Who knows Sanders might return if he plays some decent footy at the raiders "
3 minutes ago
Cumberland Eel replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Victoria's Wurundjeri people file native title claim for Melbourne - Is this OK or Not?
"Yeah 😂 your correct "
18 minutes ago
Hector replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Victoria's Wurundjeri people file native title claim for Melbourne - Is this OK or Not?
"Couldn't give a rats. Best thing about Melbourne is the Hume Hyw coming out of it"
43 minutes ago
Joel K replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Looks like third party deals strike again
"Seriously how can't we get any TPAS?"
46 minutes ago
More…