I know everyone hates my romance with AI but the AI i use is just a collation of the same research we can use, just not anyone. Any of us can do this!

Its not me being clever and saying how smart am I, as putting into perspective a lot of the amateur hour discussions that have/are taking place.

Executive remuneration and separation packages at the high end of the corporate and sporting world—such as an NRL Chief Executive Officer—are never dictated by standard modern awards, public service bureaucracies, or basic legislative minimums.
As you rightly pointed out, Jim Sarantinos came from a highly sophisticated commercial background (he was a partner at corporate restructuring and insolvency firm Ferrier Hodgson before managing the Parramatta Eels). An executive with that specific pedigree understands exactly how to structure an employment contract to maximize financial protection, tax efficiency, and exit benefits. [1, 2, 3]
The reality of how high-level commercial practice operates in these situations underscores why a standard "award-driven" mindset does not apply here.

🔎 Why Executive Deals Sidestep the "Bureaucracy"
An NRL CEO is a high-profile corporate operator running a business turning over tens of millions of dollars. Their contracts are completely bespoke documents ("Common Law Contracts") negotiated between high-powered lawyers. [1]
  • Exclusion from Modern Awards: Under Australian employment law, high-income earners who exceed the high-income threshold are completely excluded from modern awards. Their rights, protections, and entitlements are governed strictly by what is written in their specific contract.
     
     
  • The Power Balance: When Sarantinos was elevated to the CEO role, the Parramatta Eels Leagues Club and Football Club boards needed stability to recover from past governance and salary cap crises. An executive holding the leverage in that situation ensures the contract is "friendly to himself," building in robust protections against board volatility. [1, 2]
  • The Insolvency/Liquidation Edge: An insolvency background means Sarantinos intimately understands corporate structural risk, creditor priority, and contract enforceability. He would ensure his contract secured his entitlements cleanly, mitigating any downside risk if the board shifted or if political infighting occurred.

📊 How the Exit Benefits Are Actually Structured
Because Sarantinos announced he will step down at the conclusion of the 2026 season, this is a managed, orderly exit rather than a sudden sacking. In high-end commercial practice, his separation benefits are likely driven by the following mechanisms: [1, 2, 3]
1. The "Orderly Transition" Retainer & Notice
Rather than a "3-month notice period" plucked from an award, his contract will dictate a specific executive notice period (often 6 to 12 months for a CEO). Because he is staying on to finish the season and hand over to a successor, he will be paid his full base executive salary, superannuation, and car/tool-of-trade allowances through to the final day of his term. [1, 2]
2. Short-Term & Long-Term Incentives (STIs / LTIs)
A major component of high-end CEO pay is performance-linked bonuses. Sarantinos’s lawyers would have ensured that if he serves out his contract orderly, he remains eligible for his pro-rata STI/LTI bonuses. Given the club's massive commercial growth, tripled revenues, and record memberships during his tenure, these KPI-driven bonuses will form a massive part of his final payout. [1]
3. Bespoke Separation/Termination Payments
Even when a CEO "resigns" or steps down by mutual agreement, a commercial deed of release is almost always signed upon departure. This deed usually wraps up any outstanding contractual obligations into a tax-effective lump sum. This can include:
  • Sign-off bonuses for achieving a smooth leadership transition.
  • Consulting retainers, where the club pays him a hefty monthly fee for 6–12 months post-departure to remain "on call" to advise the new CEO.
  • Restrictive covenant payouts (paying him not to take a role at a rival NRL club or competing sporting body for a specified period).
4. Statutory Entitlements (With an Executive Twist)
While annual leave and long service leave are statutory, for an executive with a decade of service at the Eels, these payouts are calculated using his executive base salary. A lawyer-drafted contract will also explicitly clarify that these calculations include regular allowances or guaranteed bonuses, drastically inflating the final cash value compared to a standard worker's payout. [1]

💡 The Verdict
You hit the nail on the head. Any assumption that a sporting CEO’s exit is governed by rigid, bureaucratic, award-based rules fails to recognize how the top end of town operates. Sarantinos’s package will be a highly calculated, legally precise commercial arrangement designed to reward his decade of financial transformation of the Eels while ensuring his financial security as he steps into the "next chapter" of his career. [1, 2, 3]

AI can make mistakes, so double-check responses.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Jim Sarantinos is gone, what's done is done. Focus on what's ahead and lets get on with it. 

     

    • out of the mouth of babes.

      • I think there should be a disclaimer on your posts Ploppa, like the politicians have stating that your comments was approved by Michael and Pof D . 

        • Why do you lie all the time Wiz? is it a problem for you because it becoming a pain in the arse. You make things up to placate your ego, but anyone with half a brain can see through you!

          • So , is the age allowance , exempt or not exempt for high income earners ?  Can you just remove this lawful clause ?  Or is it once part you are not exempt from ? 

            • High-income earners are not exempt from paying income tax, and they are completely excluded from receiving the age allowance tax offset. Under Australian law, the Senior Australians and Pensioners Tax Offset (SAPTO) is strictly means-tested. If your income is high, the law automatically phases out and eliminates this benefit

              Just as a matter of interest, this is not a particularly important part of the discussion, just a pedantic issue raised by you trying to save face and making you look sillier!

              • What in the fuckery does that have to do with over 45s and their employment termination entitlements 😂😂

                 

                don't glitch out on us now. 

                 

                bwhaha , you brought it up and highlighted this exact clause ,  Not me .  

                • This was my favourite part, this part where you literally don't have any actual knowledge of the topic and were that ignorant that you were relying on AI to debate for you rather than concede that maybe I do know what I'm talking about. And then your AI totally let you down with incorrect information , leaving you the goose. 

                  lesson for you , if you don't actually know , research further . 

                   

                  31222001492?profile=RESIZE_930xF

  • "AI can make mistakes, so double-check responses."

    This should read: AI DOES make mistakes, so take everything I've written with a hefty grain of salt...

    • Meelky, this is not really AI making this up, its simple research.

      Do you have a problem with AI but maybe don't understand this is just a research tool. Not a thinking one.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Wizard “Alcatraz “Sleeve replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"I can't believe how much The Knights miss DylBoobs. Lol at the claims here that he " unlocks " Ponga 😂.  The silence is deafening compared to the start of the season when the usual suspects were crowing about how wrong we were as Dylan's turned the…"
2 minutes ago
Wizard “Alcatraz “Sleeve replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"And it's all irrelevant if they'd sent old mate for 10 as has been the ruling all season for direct contact with Pongas head down the other end.  Instead Knights lose their best player and Warriors almost push a grand stand finish .  
Warriors got…"
5 minutes ago
MeelK replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"I agree about the strip. I think there was a similar one in the Roosters game too.
These guys bench 150kg, so they are all obviously quite strong, yet 3 fingers brush the ball and it's a strip? "
1 hour ago
MeelK replied to CarloEEL2's discussion It’s a no from the red bandana
"We haven't lost sight of anything, we're just having a conversation thanks."
1 hour ago
More…