You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Pezet should play 20+ games for us. We'll be paying him what he's worth (to us).
There is huge demand for halves and Pezet is one of the best available, especially for long term value. He could have gotten $1M from plenty of clubs. But not from us,…"
There is huge demand for halves and Pezet is one of the best available, especially for long term value. He could have gotten $1M from plenty of clubs. But not from us,…"
"No chance in hell he's on mill per in Brisbane let me reiterate zero chance.If 600 is the going rate for part time players Parra will be paying close to a mill for anything that looks decent coming in the door if at all.
600 again is too much for a…"
600 again is too much for a…"
"Fuck the club bro, we ain't winning shit with the clowns on that board"
"He is bullshitting you. This kid is 18 and just spent the year playing for his school team. When SBW was 18 he was already playing reserve grade and dominating against grown men."
Replies
In short no if it is a third party unrelated to the club (unlimited). If it is a third party related to the club (ie., Marquee Allowance - 600K) then yes.
The NRL use nominal values for players. If a player signs on for a very low cap salary the NRL will not accept the contract ie., Folau. Folau was reportedly on 500K with Brisbane when he left and in his last year he was the form centre of the comp and his value (if he stayed) would have gone up. Parramatta offered Folau (on the cap) 50% or less of his previous salary with Brisbane. Like Sam Burgess Folau's status (and worth) went up when he left the game even though both failed in another sport.