But did guymer play left back row with kelma in the front row? Just rewatxhing and thats how it looked for me?
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"I agree with you Wiz. The Dogs cut him loose because he was on big money, was carrying too much weight and was out with injury too often.
With us, he has lost the weight, has been relatively injury free, is teaching the younger players, is a clear…"
With us, he has lost the weight, has been relatively injury free, is teaching the younger players, is a clear…"
"Chiefy, what the fcuk are you talking about, there were no politics with Saratinos, he was doing his best to hold the ship together.....just reinforcing, he was not tapped or ousted as you have said......he volunteered because he realised we were…"
"Though Coryn, we aren't giving Ryles what he needs, but where are the players dying to play for him? His message is not strong enough to pry them over. I mean BA at least was able to get some decent signings. He got Lomax basically on his own."
Replies
Williams front row sorry. Kelma right edge
Guymer played 82 mins, at left backrow.
Tuilagi played right backrow for 70 mins.
Paulo (55) & William (59) were props for most of the game. Doorey (28) & Mataele (29) the extra prop mins. Otherwise DBL & Walker were 'lock' and I think Pryke played middle and may have covered Tuilagi?
Thought Guymer was caught turning in a few times from edge backrow. Needs to communicate with his inside defender a bit more?
Doorey?
Doorey done his ACL, do you mean Pryke or Moretti?
What did moretti play
Trombone.
2nd Fiddle
Only thing I noticed from Guymer was his light weight hit and spin carries, being gased and getting wrong footed in defence too often.
Sorry, I'm just not a Guymer fan.
His carries are soft and indeed the hit and spin he does are not inspriring.
But he was crucial for us in defence. Tackled everything and covered so well for Moretti, Taulagi etc...who were missing tackles.
He's still young (22!) but his ceiling might be low Guymer, but with a high-ish floor. We need to develop his ball skills and he'll be the 13 maybe.
Guymer just isn't ready for First Grade yet. He has the smarts but his body isn't there. His future is at lock, he needs to build up some muscle, doesn't bend the line or even dent it. He knows the hit and spin but doesn't pump the legs. Has a decent pass on both sides of the ruck. Can be our starting 13 next year if he can have a big off season. We don't have a starting 13 unless Hopgood takes back that role.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next