With all the rumours going around lately that we are looking to sign Nathan Merritt i was wondering if anyone thinks there is any point when i think Inu would be a better player.
I keep hearing people saying that Merritt is too old and while i think he could still be a good player i think that, if we are going to sign a new winger to replace Sio (most likely) than it should be Inu. He is much bigger and stronger than Merritt (which is why Arthur chose Toutai in the first place), he is better defensively, I love the combination of Hopoate and Inu on the right and i can't point out enough how good it would be having a decent spare goalkicker.
They would be on about the same amount and if we are hell bent on signing another winger than i'd prefer Inu and may even be able to sign him to play for us this year.
Replies
When we have kids like Fabian Goodall producing the kinds of perfomances they are and have outside backs like Hunt and Morgan who can't get in the side, I honestly think investing in another winger is the LAST thing wed' be thinking about
X2
Don't need or want neither, we have good enough backs and back ups.
I'll rephrase the question. Instead of Merritt, which reports say we are trying to buy wouldn't Inu offer more value money?
to answer your question, its my opinion Inu would be better value....Merritt is a great at finishing a try, but thats pretty much their job. Inu can finish a try too.
But like everyone else said, dont need them, Sio gets the jobs done, and I actually like him as a player.
We dont need or want either, next.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next