Interpersonal ban list

I'm totally fed up with the same members just trolling each other's comments. As such, I'm having to start again placing interpersonal bans on certain members who can't seem to behave civilly - footy is back and there's plenty to talk about now, so noone can use boredom as an excuse. An interpersonal ban means that you are not to post a reply to the person you are on a ban with, nor mention them in anyway. It's really annoying that I have to do this, but I've been asking for the feuding between members to get reigned in for some time and it's not happening. This blog will keep track of the bans and suspensions follow for breaches.

1/3: Snake & Bricktop

1/3: Snake & Grunta

1/3: Grunta & Fong

7/3: Grunt & Al

7/3: Grunta and Poppa

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • Sounds fine to me, i find interpersonal bans very easy because its only the obsessed blokes who struggle, as long as you act on broken bans im all for it.

  • I've been trolling Slugg's comments. There hasn't been anything of an interpersonal nature though, other than me asking how his balls were going. I was concerned, he said he kept tripping over them. I hope we are all good Slugg I come in peace LOL.
  • Constant trolling is definitely a turn off for this site.
    However the occasional light hearted verbal rant can be amusing

    How about a 1EE side page:
    Fight club
    Posters can get their angst off their chests in fight club but not talk about it on the front page
    Actually probably not helpful - I retract
  • Phil these bans may be discriminatory.
    If Fong & Grunta are the same person, you may be discriminating against a person with a multiple personality disorder.
  • Exactly right, they only ever come when somebody fights back.

  • Phil, how are you going to enforce this if they change their membership name?
    There are loopholes everywhere here
  • In your balls? Concerned more so than genuine interest lol.
    • This reply was deleted.
      • Not much really.
        • This reply was deleted.
          • Oh I forgot that part about the shoelaces.
  • The only time sick pictures of children is raised is by you Fudgie?
    There's something in that for everyone....

    Anyway, not a problem. What happened to the peace to all blog by the king of packing Fudge? I stuck to it.
    It just won't be the same without the Snakie Smudge and Frankie Fudge Bro Show?

    Anyway, point taken and hands down, bring on the footy!
    Go you Eels!
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Parra Should Swoop On McNamara If Bennett Heads To Souths
"Don't forget to remind us with a "told you so" when it happens PP..... your definitely a visionary!"
13 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Houston In Hindsight: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly
"Yes, well said TAD. Generally speaking, the opposite applies for coaches, IMO. They should get better with age.
Who cares Bennett is mid-70s. He's our best option IMO, and I'm a Jauncey fan like you. Their records speak for themselves, even if…"
15 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Houston In Hindsight: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly
"Trouble is Hugo you either didn't read it or understand it....it was pointed out that Dolphins actually have an older pack than we do...notwithstanding individuals within it. Most of your critique is for the sake of being critical, you never offer a…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Houston In Hindsight: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly
"That was actually a pretty incisive commentary Carls, not sure what they do after a win, but you could argue "win again" but that decision lies on the field which leaves us with the cattle and the coach! Interesting to see without Moses and now Guth…"
1 hour ago
More…