Interpersonal ban list

I'm totally fed up with the same members just trolling each other's comments. As such, I'm having to start again placing interpersonal bans on certain members who can't seem to behave civilly - footy is back and there's plenty to talk about now, so noone can use boredom as an excuse. An interpersonal ban means that you are not to post a reply to the person you are on a ban with, nor mention them in anyway. It's really annoying that I have to do this, but I've been asking for the feuding between members to get reigned in for some time and it's not happening. This blog will keep track of the bans and suspensions follow for breaches.

1/3: Snake & Bricktop

1/3: Snake & Grunta

1/3: Grunta & Fong

7/3: Grunt & Al

7/3: Grunta and Poppa

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • Sounds fine to me, i find interpersonal bans very easy because its only the obsessed blokes who struggle, as long as you act on broken bans im all for it.

  • I've been trolling Slugg's comments. There hasn't been anything of an interpersonal nature though, other than me asking how his balls were going. I was concerned, he said he kept tripping over them. I hope we are all good Slugg I come in peace LOL.
  • Constant trolling is definitely a turn off for this site.
    However the occasional light hearted verbal rant can be amusing

    How about a 1EE side page:
    Fight club
    Posters can get their angst off their chests in fight club but not talk about it on the front page
    Actually probably not helpful - I retract
  • Phil these bans may be discriminatory.
    If Fong & Grunta are the same person, you may be discriminating against a person with a multiple personality disorder.
  • Exactly right, they only ever come when somebody fights back.

  • Phil, how are you going to enforce this if they change their membership name?
    There are loopholes everywhere here
  • In your balls? Concerned more so than genuine interest lol.
    • This reply was deleted.
      • Not much really.
        • This reply was deleted.
          • Oh I forgot that part about the shoelaces.
  • The only time sick pictures of children is raised is by you Fudgie?
    There's something in that for everyone....

    Anyway, not a problem. What happened to the peace to all blog by the king of packing Fudge? I stuck to it.
    It just won't be the same without the Snakie Smudge and Frankie Fudge Bro Show?

    Anyway, point taken and hands down, bring on the footy!
    Go you Eels!
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Offside replied to Bob mertens's discussion WILL there’s a way.
"Id say of the two Russell has shown signs of improvement 
Will has repressed so much"
3 hours ago
Uncle Wizardssleeve- Indigenous Elder-Freemason Hunter -He/Him replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Tigers to discuss early release for Galvin 2026 season.
"Last time I went through Abu Dhabi transit lounge , he was sitting there waiting on Roy Spagnolo to send him details for his connecting flight . I didn't have the heart to tell him.  Just told him Ricky Stuart and the boys are lookimg forward to his…"
6 hours ago
Parra_Greg replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion Is tapau worth a look?
"Nah
 "
6 hours ago
Parra_Greg replied to Bob mertens's discussion WILL there’s a way.
"He has not kicked on...as a centre probably the worst defensive centre in the league.  Doesnt have hands or a pass....just cant see him progressing actually he is almost as bad as Sean Russell"
6 hours ago
More…