Eels Blogs

Replies

• 

  Tin Tim March 17, 2016 at 6:53am

  That's why Klemmer should have been fined or suspended for one match. Allow this at NRL level, it will filter down.
  • 

    Robert Lloyd > Tin Tim March 17, 2016 at 9:08am

     Klemmer plays for Canterbury. Who is the Guardian Angel of Canterbury? Soon to be NRL`s CEO !!!!!? If you think it`s bad now, wait until then. The Eels future could be under threat. Action needed to clear out the stables ASAP, and get someone with ability the fight for the Eels.
• 

  josh jones March 17, 2016 at 8:20am

  If they're not going follow through on the rule or any rule for that matter then remove it. It just increases the already lack of confidence toward the NRL. NRL shooting themselves in the foot over and over again.
• 

  speedy2460 March 17, 2016 at 9:42am

  Lets get real..The so called offences of this week were the weakest charges imaginable. If you done those things to your female partner, would you be charged? There was no option but to chuck them out. If the NRL wants to wander down this

  "no touching" road, then the appropriate penalty is a fine..Maybe $500.00. I realise the B & G faithful see some sort of conspiracy here, but it just doesnt exist
• 

  Sir Col "THE NODDY MUSHROOM" March 17, 2016 at 10:38am

  Touching a ref is now "dirty play"??? FFS

  Belting a ref like the young guy did should be punished with a life ban - and a life ban from any involvement in the game.

  I agree with Benji and Ennis - accidental type of touching give them a fine - not suspension.

  If the player offends a 2nd time then triple the fine - if it ever happens again then suspension could be in order.

  BUT - how many players have we seen front the judiciary a 2nd time for this disgustingly abhorrent offence?

  None that I know of.
• 

  Sir Col "THE NODDY MUSHROOM" March 17, 2016 at 5:20pm

  Best part about playing dirty is you need LOTS of Sponge Baths Poppa.