Eels Blogs

Inglis not charged your kidding

Posted by Speech on May 15, 2016 at 5:00pm
Inglis was angry as he was tackled into touch. He deliberately moves elbow to position of players head and head slams the player into ground coming down with elbow. The charges should be deliberately attacking the head of a player. The player was out for the rest of the game. It does not matter whether you strike a player standing up or on the ground same offence. This act was low and should be treated as such. NRL has become a biased joke
Views: 18

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

★
★
★
★
★
Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –
Follow

Replies

  • Webby May 15, 2016 at 5:07pm

    I thought Edwards milked it and then wasn't allowed back on...got the penalty but then missed the rest of the game.

    Not a fan of this laying down crap.

  • Angry Eel May 15, 2016 at 5:10pm
    Disgrace. Did anyone see what Reynolds did to Farah in Bulldogs game? That was no accident either
    • Angry Eel > Angry Eel May 15, 2016 at 6:09pm
      It's called peripheral vision. You don't need to look directly at something to know where it is
    • Angry Eel > Angry Eel May 15, 2016 at 7:11pm
      If you trip, you stumble. That was no stumble. He deliberately jumped and tucked his legs so that knees could deliver all his weight
  • Evil Elvis May 15, 2016 at 5:12pm
    I keep thinking how everyone would have reacted if it was the other way around. The commentators would have been crying for blood if Kenny drove Inglis's head into the ground with his elbow.
    • wiggy 71 > Evil Elvis May 15, 2016 at 5:22pm
      Especially Andrew "I call the game fair" John's.
  • Moray Eel May 15, 2016 at 5:13pm
    Inglis is Teflon.
    • wiggy 71 > Moray Eel May 15, 2016 at 5:21pm
      Future immortal
  • Rise of an empire May 15, 2016 at 6:15pm
    I have said for years Inglis is the most protected species in the game
  • Michael Ericson May 15, 2016 at 6:44pm
    That was worth a couple of weeks
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"Damn it HKF, I was gonna ask where did Didly Squat come from to look them up.
Next you'll say Hock isn't coming."
30 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"I am not too disheartened by that. If we got him then great but he is 29, having a few injuries and though a really good Winger he is an average Centre. I would rather Murray Taulagi."
31 minutes ago
HKF replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"Spot on, other clubs are starting to announce signings but we have signed didly squat,  no didly is not a winger."
36 minutes ago
Cumberland Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"I'm more interested in who the Eels are going to sign to replace Lomax instead of worrying about the players that don't want to be at Parra. When are we going to hear some good positive signing news or it that it"
1 hour ago
More…

Eels blogs

Social Blogs