Eels Blogs

Inglis not charged your kidding

Posted by Speech on May 15, 2016 at 5:00pm
Inglis was angry as he was tackled into touch. He deliberately moves elbow to position of players head and head slams the player into ground coming down with elbow. The charges should be deliberately attacking the head of a player. The player was out for the rest of the game. It does not matter whether you strike a player standing up or on the ground same offence. This act was low and should be treated as such. NRL has become a biased joke
Views: 19

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

★
★
★
★
★
Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –
Follow

Replies

  • Webby May 15, 2016 at 5:07pm

    I thought Edwards milked it and then wasn't allowed back on...got the penalty but then missed the rest of the game.

    Not a fan of this laying down crap.

  • Angry Eel May 15, 2016 at 5:10pm
    Disgrace. Did anyone see what Reynolds did to Farah in Bulldogs game? That was no accident either
    • Angry Eel > Angry Eel May 15, 2016 at 6:09pm
      It's called peripheral vision. You don't need to look directly at something to know where it is
    • Angry Eel > Angry Eel May 15, 2016 at 7:11pm
      If you trip, you stumble. That was no stumble. He deliberately jumped and tucked his legs so that knees could deliver all his weight
  • Evil Elvis May 15, 2016 at 5:12pm
    I keep thinking how everyone would have reacted if it was the other way around. The commentators would have been crying for blood if Kenny drove Inglis's head into the ground with his elbow.
    • wiggy 71 > Evil Elvis May 15, 2016 at 5:22pm
      Especially Andrew "I call the game fair" John's.
  • Moray Eel May 15, 2016 at 5:13pm
    Inglis is Teflon.
    • wiggy 71 > Moray Eel May 15, 2016 at 5:21pm
      Future immortal
  • Rise of an empire May 15, 2016 at 6:15pm
    I have said for years Inglis is the most protected species in the game
  • Michael Ericson May 15, 2016 at 6:44pm
    That was worth a couple of weeks
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

The Badger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Sunday Vegas Villans Brown v Gutho 7 big questions
"1: Both
2: Manly
3: Walsh
4: 2926 ...Inanimate Carbon Rod
5: Re-sign if going well at Round 10 for another 3 years.
6: 8th
7: Maybe later ..."
25 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Sunday Vegas Villans Brown v Gutho 7 big questions
"1. Not really interested in Vegas games. 
2. Melbourne Storm
3. Don't really have one
4. 2926 is a long way off 
5. Yes
6. 4th
7. 😗"
32 minutes ago
Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Sunday Vegas Villans Brown v Gutho 7 big questions
"1. Gutho, same for me total douche off the field.
2. Bulldogs, trying to buy a premiership, but not smart enough to.
3. Ezra Mam, obvious reasons and feel free to google his stupid back tattoo. 
4. 2926 is a long way away, but I'll go with…"
2 hours ago
shane replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Sunday Vegas Villans Brown v Gutho 7 big questions
"1 both
2 souths ( the new roosters, they seem to be the NRL favorites with no salary cap )
3 over rated Mitchell
4 will find out when they debut
5 no would wait till the end of season and see how we go
6 8th
 "
2 hours ago
More…

Eels blogs

Social Blogs