Yeah this was very strange. The blokes in the bunker were either blind, too scared to make a decision or cheating. I'd imagine it was the second and if so scared to make a decision they should be sacked.
If the NRL will accommodate this rorting of the use of the challenge, then thee ref can honour their challenge but Herbert should had been sin binned for deliberately giving a penalty. I thought challenge is about the referee's call. The last challenge was about the ref's non-call. How could that be? The ref is Peter Gough (?) again isn't it?
Benjie just pointed out that if Brimson had been contacted in the head by Paulo, Brinson should had been gone out for an HIA. Twhoever in the bunker should be penalised heavily since it could costs the Eels this game. But with the peopled runiing the NRL, what can you expect.😏
"If you can't figure out that the NRL isn't corrupt after 40yrs then I'm afraid you never will. Yes, I still occasionally watch the games and watch the Eels as I have for over 40 yrs but I'm not blind to the fact that Rugby League will never be as…"
"Just because I am cheering for Dunsters. In his 4 games of footy in NSW Cup this year:
- 6 tries
- 58.2 PCM/game
- 7.3 tackle brakes a game (highest avg in NSW Cup)
- 19.8 runs/game
- 186.7m/gane
Keep in mind he did not play in the trials because of…"
Replies
And Mahoney did not strip
Bunker missed Herbert high shot on Opacic
Then sends off Pauli for hurting Brimsons shoulder
Missed two incidents with Herbert, the first one was just on half time with the swing tackle with Opacic landing on his head.
Yeah this was very strange. The blokes in the bunker were either blind, too scared to make a decision or cheating. I'd imagine it was the second and if so scared to make a decision they should be sacked.
Let it go.
Its not BAs job to question the bunker.
BAs job is to coach.
No you are wrong
The top coaches do not have a whinge during the presser for themselves
They do it because it works and gets them results next week
If the NRL will accommodate this rorting of the use of the challenge, then thee ref can honour their challenge but Herbert should had been sin binned for deliberately giving a penalty. I thought challenge is about the referee's call. The last challenge was about the ref's non-call. How could that be? The ref is Peter Gough (?) again isn't it?
He won't as he is weak as piss and knows the NRL are what they are!
Benjie just pointed out that if Brimson had been contacted in the head by Paulo, Brinson should had been gone out for an HIA. Twhoever in the bunker should be penalised heavily since it could costs the Eels this game. But with the peopled runiing the NRL, what can you expect.😏