Mahoney knocked backwards and should have been a sin bin
Mahoney was facing his own dead ball line and knocked it back. It was not a knock on.
Titan's player should have been sent off
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"What woud be the reason for getting him back? Does he fill a role we don't have filled?"
"No one gets a fair draw. Fair draw is playing everyone home and away. So it not anout fairness, it's about getting the least worst draw"
"Yeah, surely in magic round the home teams get to wet their beaks, otherwise they lose revenue..."
Replies
And Mahoney did not strip
Bunker missed Herbert high shot on Opacic
Then sends off Pauli for hurting Brimsons shoulder
Missed two incidents with Herbert, the first one was just on half time with the swing tackle with Opacic landing on his head.
Yeah this was very strange. The blokes in the bunker were either blind, too scared to make a decision or cheating. I'd imagine it was the second and if so scared to make a decision they should be sacked.
Let it go.
Its not BAs job to question the bunker.
BAs job is to coach.
No you are wrong
The top coaches do not have a whinge during the presser for themselves
They do it because it works and gets them results next week
If the NRL will accommodate this rorting of the use of the challenge, then thee ref can honour their challenge but Herbert should had been sin binned for deliberately giving a penalty. I thought challenge is about the referee's call. The last challenge was about the ref's non-call. How could that be? The ref is Peter Gough (?) again isn't it?
He won't as he is weak as piss and knows the NRL are what they are!
Benjie just pointed out that if Brimson had been contacted in the head by Paulo, Brinson should had been gone out for an HIA. Twhoever in the bunker should be penalised heavily since it could costs the Eels this game. But with the peopled runiing the NRL, what can you expect.😏
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next