You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"much prefer Ryles's R & R, as he is focused on developing from within, playing the long game, and our depth throughout the grades is now justifying his vision.
I agree with this bit but in the same breath are you wanting to wait another 3-5 years…"
I agree with this bit but in the same breath are you wanting to wait another 3-5 years…"
"How bout context you use any of that when you talk about the mentioned.Only reason I bring this up is because of the lack of it you used in chiefs case.
I mean he brings up what Jim mentioned but completely doesn't mention the head butting BA and…"
I mean he brings up what Jim mentioned but completely doesn't mention the head butting BA and…"
"That's where we are screwed to be able to compete on the same footing we need to be afforded the same advantages other clubs have or come up with something that is more creative to offset the mentioneds advantage.
Recruitment at some point we have…"
Recruitment at some point we have…"
Replies
Haha like that analogy!
I'm sure they'll have a bunch of examples that had no charge attached. Even Gutho copped a high shot, they didn't even stop the game. He got up groggily and played the ball.
Definitely
I just read that Radley got a $700 fine for his hit on Gutho? WTF?
Kunto Kent said NBrown shoulda been sent....
No he didn't. He said that people romanticise about how the game has lost its toughness but, 30 years ago, that tackle would have resulted in a send off.
I call BS on Kent. The ref didnt even put it on report. I think the ref saw it for what it was, a falling player caught high but no swinging arm. Penalty is enough.
Yeah but the Kent is wrong. If he were correct, then in the Ray price copping it days, Parra would never have played against a full side and Ray Price may not have been knocked about as much as he was.
Can we employ the Roosters barrister or would that be a clash of interest?