How much Influence will the Referees Have in 2018?

After the total debacle of refereeing standards in the NRL the last few years. I’m very curious to know what others think the referees will have on the outcome of NRL games in 2018. I think the Eels were hard done by last year in many games and in particular the finals game against the Melbourne Storm still leaves a bitter taste in my mouth. I’m hoping the referees don’t have too much negative influence on results this year and the calls for the most part are at least 50/50. However, I just can’t shake off the feeling that many games will be affected by either poor refereeing standards or blatant and dubious decisions to favour certain teams and players.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Get over it Monto. Refs make mistakes, they aren't going to get it right every time. Every fan could make the case that their club has been given a rough time of it by refs. 

    Refs are there to make a judgement using the rule book as a framework to make those decisions. It's a judgement, and judgement is flawed, but it's the best we've got.

    • Well said Brett. It’s human nature not to remember all the times the ref made a mistake in your team’s favour. Referees are people, and they make mistakes. It all comes out in the wash.

    • Ah.. Yes and no. ...put it this way. The NRL would much much rather receive a complaint call from the Titans / Newcastle than from the Roosters / Storm about a referee performance...and they referee accordingly.
    • Agreed Brett, well said.
    • Get over what Brett ? It’s just a simple question mate! If you don’t want to answer it without being sarcastic then don’t read the blog my friend! If you think that referees are not biased or don’t make blatant incorrect decisions rather than honest mistakes then I’m afriad Brett your living in a fairy tale land and not in the real world. Perhaps Brett this is a ‘payback’ becasue I’ve said I hate Cricket is it?

  • This reply was deleted.
    • That’s a good point Tad and there certainly needs to be something in place to weed out the more ‘blatant corrupted’ referees than the more sincere ones.

  • The same as the last few years. I dont mind small mistakes here and there but its the obvious howlers that get to me. Those descisions that every person watching the game can see yet the officials are the only ones who see it different. I expect more of the same this year as the NRL usually refuse to acknowledge these obvious mistakes.

    • Yes, FME perhaps I should have said the past 10 years instead of few years as it’s obviously got worse than better and more blatant than honest.

  • There’s a huge difference between ‘honest mistakes’ and ‘blatant incorrect decisions’ Poupou! Referees are not ‘infallible’ and if corruption can exist in other sporting codes and amongst referees in other sporting codes then why not Rugby League or are we missing something?

  • Who are the referees that are blatantly corrupt?

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"LB, Eli, good discussion gents. We've acted in good-faith. By the book. With clean hands. Lomax appears not to have. But regardless of that, equity is not unlikely to view a 3-year restraint until 31 Oct 28' as overly-punitive and read it down.
We'd…"
12 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"The best thing for the Eels is if we say nothing our position is clear we only have to come back to the table if Melbourne come with something we see as advantageous for us that really is the bottom line.
Best thing about this there the ones doing…"
1 hour ago
Eli Stephens replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"If you look at it from a player for player deal, would you rather Lomax or Howarth if you are the Storm but ? I just don't see any way legally the storm can force the eels to hand them Lomax 🤣 either way don't really care what storm end up doing but…"
6 hours ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"I know i have said it before but Storm fans say we are being unreasonable and see no outcome in which we win this case. Despite all the released, that is still the belief. I believe in bias and backing your team but come on.
But i do not think they…"
7 hours ago
More…