We looked so much better with hands on the field, surely coach can see that!
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Have you seen Roosters pack? "
"NAS wants Eels, I want NAS. Keaon want Roosters, I don't want Keaon. Simple"
"Roosters and these "wheelin and dealin" clubs can have their fun.
We are very conservative with our financial approach especially now and I think we'll stay that way and we should.
The figures like Politis and Gould that the media masturbates over…"
We are very conservative with our financial approach especially now and I think we'll stay that way and we should.
The figures like Politis and Gould that the media masturbates over…"
"Never listened to his (or any other) talk back radio. He seemed to be good at what he did though and I remember my grandmother loved his show.
Good innings. RIP."
Good innings. RIP."
Replies
I thought he was alright early on. Needs to cut out the stupid penalties.
He needs to play the first 20-25 max! Anyone can see how slowly he gets once that fatigue sets in.
He gives away them penalties when he is gassed, unfortunately that's about after 15 mins
Coach is an imbecile.
Too slow out of dummy half imo. I thought the team looks quicker and better in attack with hands on the field. Next week with no moses will be tough.
Agree energy lifted when Hands came on
Coach is a dumb stubborn idiot!
FIRE HIM!!
Did we though? Hands I didn't think was good tonight, Hodgson though? Looked good.
Hodgson offered more movement on either end I felt.
Hodgson is past his best and too slow in my opinion. Hands is the better option but the coach thinks differently
I cried when BA said he doesn't need to play our style, we have to play his. WTF
Watching it live in Brissy, Hodgson definitely stifles our attack and takes to long in getting the ball to the halves. Hands does what Reed did, just gives them early ball and lets them out pressure on edges with the ball play / run threat.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next