They'd probably welcome any bets on Parra to finish top 4 Etc. If we were to lose points, it's free money to them. There's also no wooden spoon betting anymore, it's least wins now, so regardless of how where we finish on the ladder, if we were to have more wins than any other team which is very likely based on form, they don't have to pay out on it.
With eels_brad, bring removed from those markets would suggest bookies think they are sure to lose money because we won't lose the most matches or miss top 8. So if you think bookies have good Intel being removed film such markets is a good sign!
Betting markets get suspended for basically 2 reasons:
1) if there's a significant chance that insider information could dramatically change odds in the favour of a punter or
2) if unusual bets come through in quantity
Neither of these are likely for the Eels. Why? The bookies learned from the Storm debacle and removed the "Wooden Spoon" market and replaced it with "Fewest Wins" market. The Eels aren't likely to win that either way. And there aren't likely to be any big bets placed on either "Fewest Wins" or "Premiership Odds" for the Eels as they're appropriately placed in both markets, and it's all in the bookies favour.
What you want to watch out for is lengthening of the odds for Eels to win the premiership. Currently were watching pretty decent odds (last I checked we were behind Broncs and Cowboys).
But I doubt betting will need to be suspended. Think of it from the betting companies point of view, they'll only suspend betting if they're going to lose big money or they suspect illegal betting, otherwise they don't care.
"Yeah it is getting concerning. More so to the fact that Garrick now linked to Roosters and Taulagi to Dragons. Dragons have a chance of getting a player. Koloamatangi we go hard for and seem to miss out again. We are turning into the Dragons where…"
"Pezet should play 20+ games for us. We'll be paying him what he's worth (to us).
There is huge demand for halves and Pezet is one of the best available, especially for long term value. He could have gotten $1M from plenty of clubs. But not from us,…"
Replies
But it does not hurt the betting agencies if you bet on parra and we lose points
Might be different if you could bet against parra
You can still cash out your eels premiership bets and top 4 bets as well for a decent profit.
I don't think the betting agencies think we are losing a lot of points. And their intel is pretty good.
I cashed out anyway
I saw that although I don't understand why they removed the most losses one. Unless they think we will lose all hope and start playing crap.
1) if there's a significant chance that insider information could dramatically change odds in the favour of a punter or
2) if unusual bets come through in quantity
Neither of these are likely for the Eels. Why? The bookies learned from the Storm debacle and removed the "Wooden Spoon" market and replaced it with "Fewest Wins" market. The Eels aren't likely to win that either way. And there aren't likely to be any big bets placed on either "Fewest Wins" or "Premiership Odds" for the Eels as they're appropriately placed in both markets, and it's all in the bookies favour.
What you want to watch out for is lengthening of the odds for Eels to win the premiership. Currently were watching pretty decent odds (last I checked we were behind Broncs and Cowboys).
But I doubt betting will need to be suspended. Think of it from the betting companies point of view, they'll only suspend betting if they're going to lose big money or they suspect illegal betting, otherwise they don't care.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next