I said in #1, last week, that the Knights are given preferential treatment by referees at their home ground stadium. The recent bout of wins by the Knights was explained by that rather than the season`s best play as trumpeted by the ignorant media, the Knights players and Bennett himself. I mentioned that it would be interesting to see have the Knights performed this week away from their home ground. Last nights result show how well the Knights play when the penalties are even stevens-more or less. Next week the Eels play the Knights at Newcastle. It will be on again--the Knights get 2 to 1, 3 to 1 or even 4 to 1 penalty count in their favour. The Eels get beaten. No team can win against that corruption. I have said for several months now that we should forfeit the match against the Knights and hope that we can beat the Raiders the week after and we have enough points to make the eight. Its not a given that we will beat the raiders in Canberra
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
Replies
Thinking is hard work and a minute is a long time. Try it some time.
This thread is as stupid as anything posted by coach.
Robert,
You're a thinker.
I was using corruption in its general usage, as in when you have a disease it is often referred to as a corruption.
Awsome reply what a crack up
Dr W I have been asserting this for five or six weeks minimum. if you have just noticed it is you who have window cleaning!
Robert your two statements are in direct conflict.
Statement 1: "we should forfeit the match against the Knights"
Statement 2: " Its not a given that we will beat the raiders in Canberra"
Please explain to me (use your big words) how statement 1 makes any sense given statement 2? Even in some alternate universe where we considered a forfeit, why would we if the Raiders game was not 100% locked in.
#thismakesnofreakingsenseatall
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next