Hmmm Ticketing Prices

So a few months back when i renewed my family membership the accompanying letter stated that prices would increase however still competitive and offers great value for money etc etc.

Last year there was a clear financial advantage for being a ticketed member but with the announcement today the prices are close to on par.

Now i am not suggesting that ticketed members tickets should be considerably cheaper and overall this is a great win however i am a bit concerned that members are told that they need to pay more and today non members can get a generous saving.

I would appreciate peoples thoughts on this. Am i just whinging and is this a great win for all or does it seem a bit contradictory?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I live in qld n those prices r better then here
  • It’s just ridiculous the prices they demand for you to watch the game you love, it hasn’t been the blue collar game for years. You just wait and see what the tickets will be worth once the new stadium is built. 

  • Im still confused about the priority allocation letter i got?!

  • So with the $40 family tickets is actually cheaper for me to buy them rather than a GA membership for the family at $499 as there are 11 games at ANZ x $40 = $440

    • buy they don't get the hat and keyring. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"Phone calls are harder as you can't prove what was said unless it was tapped. Emails and the rest yeah. Parra had this in their back pocket for a while and were waiting for the final nail to drop and them threatening us with cap penalties was the…"
29 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"I am not saying we shouldn't try, just if we lose and it is a possibility even if slight, that's more likely what happens. If that does happen then it is us against the NRL mentality to fuel us."
31 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"The Seventy Maxims of Maximally Effective Mercenaries clearly states ....#29. The enemy of my enemy is my enemy's enemy. No more. No less."
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"As evident in our forums, getting folks to pull their heads in is not as easy as it seems. What if we said Fuck it. WWE needs it's villains
The Parramatta Squeaky-whEels.....We have whinged in these pages forever that we always get shafted. What…"
1 hour ago
More…