If you compare the tackles Heighingtons was ten times worse than Junior Paulos tackle.
As Pauline Hanson once said PLEASE EXPLAIN
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"That's nothing new though right I mean sticky was saying his team made 60 odd tackles before his team saw the ball and still came back and won.It feels like you could go to almost any contest any week and pick apart these wild inconsistencies within…"
"Some players need to get sacked from a club and risk losing it all before they really knuckle down and put in the work. Why did he get sacked, was it lack of discipline for footy and training or off field issues?"
"Nah I didn't watch the game I don't have too watch one game for my statement to be made I've seen enough in 2 years. His overrated"
Replies
Junior Paulos suspension was an absolute joke.At the very worse case it was reckless, but it was just a case of a very big man tackling a smaller man.There have been heaps of worse tackles since then that in many cases didnt even get a penelty.The decision for 9 weeks was a discrace
Yep Junior's tackle still the most unfair ruling in NRL history.
Poor guy wonder how Junior feels when he see's this.
It's an absolute shocker and this one deserves more
It was Junior's own fault, only reason he got such a long suspension is cos he has done the exact same tackle before.... If he is stupid enough to do it again he'll probably get 12 weeks.... He's just got to learn not to do it.
Do what exactly?
So u didn't see it? It looked more like a German Suplex than a tackle.... He got a heavy suspension last time too
Im waiting to see how many weeks Michael Ennis n Chris Heighington get I think both should get at least 10 weeks
Paulo would have only got 5 matches if he hadn't have done an equally bad tackle last year which added 70% loading.
Chris H has a clean record
^^^^^ Exactly as eels_Brad said!!! ^^^^^ So many geniuses on this site believe there is a conspiracy against us it's hilarious... I said it previously, if Paulo is stupid enough to do it again he'll be out for 12-15 weeks.... If that's the case and he does it again, no matter how good he is, he will be too much of a liability BA would seriously think of moving him on in those circumstances.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next