Great piece of footy ruined by the refs
1. Take a step back that was not a knock on
2. Hayne knocked the ball back to his stomach. Does not matter if Souths player got a finger nail on it or not.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"He signed with the Broncos first mate. But he couldn't start until Reynolds left (2027) so we picked him up for 2026. Otherwise he would have to stay in Melbourne. Everyone wins, except the Storm."
"This not buying on thing is a bit hard to take serious with the Peasant in for a year then gone agin thing. "
"I don't think they are as concerned about their reputations as some folk on here. I commented yesterday how good it is that it's all quiet since the beginning of November."
"Here is an article mentioning some of what was said.
https://www.news.com.au/sport/nrl/back-himself-to-play-liv-golf-box..."
https://www.news.com.au/sport/nrl/back-himself-to-play-liv-golf-box..."
Replies
Go to the good guys and ask for a 4k tv trade in buddy
Lol knock on! Ha
It’s just crap unlucky shit could of should of didnt can’t missed dropped nearly close
But not good enough
Hayne’s hand was in front of his body and the ball travelled backwards and hit him in the stomach. Not a knock on. It is not like he bumped the ball forwards hitting a Souths player then back to him. He made a valid and skill ful catch with no error and maybe in the process Souths got a fingernail on it. That is not a knock on
Disagree Wile as if you watch the replay it comes off Hayne and touches the south player before Hayne recovers the catch, unfortunately the refs got it right for once.
Hayne fumbled it then it touched the fingers of the Souths player. Clearly a knock on
It went backwards off Haynes hand
It came off Haynes hand, touches a south player before regathering control, constitutes a knock on. Don't like it but the refs got it right and can not blame them.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next