Great piece of footy ruined by the refs
1. Take a step back that was not a knock on
2. Hayne knocked the ball back to his stomach. Does not matter if Souths player got a finger nail on it or not.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"You should smile more, you're prettier when you smile"
"Urgent athletes is what we need and both those guys fit the description on the edge."
"HOE, you're right to point to a court write down as being capable of permitting a spin where V'Landys claims he was the sensible one.
However - and lawyers please step in to clarify - I believe a write down is not a writing. That is, a write down…"
However - and lawyers please step in to clarify - I believe a write down is not a writing. That is, a write down…"
"Can you explain, Mitchy, why it's TDS to point out Trump is clearly central to a pedo circle? And is in Russia's pocket?
I just don't see what's funny I guess "
I just don't see what's funny I guess "
Replies
Go to the good guys and ask for a 4k tv trade in buddy
Lol knock on! Ha
It’s just crap unlucky shit could of should of didnt can’t missed dropped nearly close
But not good enough
Hayne’s hand was in front of his body and the ball travelled backwards and hit him in the stomach. Not a knock on. It is not like he bumped the ball forwards hitting a Souths player then back to him. He made a valid and skill ful catch with no error and maybe in the process Souths got a fingernail on it. That is not a knock on
Disagree Wile as if you watch the replay it comes off Hayne and touches the south player before Hayne recovers the catch, unfortunately the refs got it right for once.
Hayne fumbled it then it touched the fingers of the Souths player. Clearly a knock on
It went backwards off Haynes hand
It came off Haynes hand, touches a south player before regathering control, constitutes a knock on. Don't like it but the refs got it right and can not blame them.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next