Just wondering if either of the teams have played at the Gabba before. If not then it's no advantage to the Broncos except for the fact it's closer in distance. I also think if the Eels had their full squad they would have a higher percentage of winning this match. Be great if they did.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • We win we make the semis no doubt.  We loose season over.  Defensively no where near the top 4 teams.   However gotta stay positive....

    • We win, we're a chance at playing finals.

      We lose, we're still a chance at playing finals.

      That said, a win tomorrow would be a serious shot in the arm!

  • They have only played there twice.
    This year, Dolphins and Roosters

  • Just gotta remember we hammered them like 50 something last year at suncorp. It obviously won't be repeated but if we get into our mojo, this team can be unstoppable.

    I've noticed we have lost alot of games after taking the lead such as both the games against the storm, the one against sharks earlier this year.

     

  • We have never played Brisbane at The Gabba before. Brisbane had never played games at The Gabba ever in their history before this women's world cup forced them to move there. I think this will be the last game you see at the ground for a very long time as well due to Brisbane moving back to Suncorp.

    • Yeah no team have played league at the GABBA since 1950's, when Lang Park was used after that.

  • What do you mean its closer in distance ? To what ?

    • I think he means it is still in Brisbane overall. Well, i think that is what he means.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Acme replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion ‘Leaks and grandstanding’: Storm boss unloads on Eels over Lomax
"From memory, they let Ryles leave early once he was announced as Eels coach, on the condition that he not approach any storm players for 12 months, which he abided by"
25 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion ‘Leaks and grandstanding’: Storm boss unloads on Eels over Lomax
"We are having restraint of trade standoff in this lomax saga and this stooge vlandys says a ten-year blackban is "legally sound"...he was lying and he knows it, they haven't tested shit, hence why he is now shuffling about mumbling to himself...It's…"
42 minutes ago
Anguillidae replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion ‘Leaks and grandstanding’: Storm boss unloads on Eels over Lomax
"So you don't think that emails between the games governing body and the Melbourne Storm (that directly relate to Zac Lomax's contract and terms of release) are relevant? "
46 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion ‘Leaks and grandstanding’: Storm boss unloads on Eels over Lomax
"Yobz  you said the following: I'd like discovery of V'Landy's emails to see why he suddenly backflipped on the 360 ban". 
Why would the discovery of these emails have any influence over the courts decision? i.e Melbourne is being talked about…"
59 minutes ago
More…