Gutherson on the move?

Now i believe a deal will get done, but i like Parramatta standing their ground on Gutherson. If anything it could be better moving forward without him as his approach has not been leadership material, Russell is a year off though could be an option in 2023 we shall hope.

https://www.zerotackle.com/worrying-silence-forms-over-gutherson-contract-talks-111620/

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • wSounds like Ayoub and Gutho tried the old, "We have huge offers from other clubs and need more to stay" Now with no huge offers forthcoming there prefrence is to stay at the Eels and are ready and waiting to sign. Oh and what a strange comment from his manager Ayoub "And I have no interest in talking about the interested parties that are keen to chat with Clint going forward.”......

    Because they all called you out and publicly stated that they wernt interested.

    Perhaps you scared them all off with $1m demands. And the worrying silence from the club is them now looking for an xfactor player to sign instead. 

    • This reply was deleted.
  • There's no worrying silence of contract talks. Once again Ayoub playing games in the press. Gutherson has an offer which he can sign today. If he wants something different it's his job to approach the club and negtotiate, not the other way around. 
    I think the club has one eye fiirmly on the future. There's much more from where the likes of Will Penisini came from and we need to make sure we're in a position to sign them as their values increase. Hence why Gutho for 4 years makes no sense to me.

    • 👍

    • I'd agree if he were 3 years older, but not 27. He's in his prime now, now is the time to go all in. 

      • He'll be 32 at the end of a 4 year deal. They'll probably talk options but I can't see the club agreeing to 4 years straight up. And why should they? What's Gutho going to do, go and play for the Tigers or Bulldogs? Good luck with that.

        • Agreed, but locking him in now for a starters basically means the club doesn't have to have a serious negotiation with him ever again, and this is the chance to lock in our spine through their best years together.

          I understand the clubs take on wanting to maintain salary cap flexibility, and I think in principle it's a good approach, but does anybody seriously think we're gonna get a better fullback for our team over the next 5 years ?

          Aside from his negotiation methods, is there a fullback out there better suited to our teams playing style ?

          We've led the league in offloads the last 3 seasons, and who do you reckon is the fullback best suited to take advantage of that ?

          I just think now is the time to say, "OK he's our guy, we're all in". 

          • This reply was deleted.
            • I'm sure Tfats what they'll offer him, I said that the other day, I'm just what I woukd offer him 

          • He's so good not even a brand new franchise with no fullback seems to want him, but we should lock him in for 5 years on 750k+ because we won't have any better options over the next half decade. 

            Sounds like we need a better recruitment and development program. 

            • How do you know the Dolphins don't want him ?

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
" Thanks Bluey,
Could be, dunno. But I wonder whether Walters would change his tune if his players do a Lomax on him, signing multiple contracts and chats with others while still under contract with him.
 Or maybe tell him they did the right thing…"
13 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Eels' 2026 Backline?
"Daz, good blog and you have addressed a very pertinent issue."
15 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Eels' 2026 Backline?
"Cobbo was a chance, Staggs, Farnworth, Best ( Best maybe given rhetoric) but none of them Cobbo (not likely) would have come to Parra. Losing Lomax was a killer but to coin one of my favourite sayings, you cannot control the uncontrollable!
We need…"
16 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"Thanks Mutts. I’ve enjoyed your commentary on this as well.
Like you, I feel, after looking at timelines despite initial concerns, Lomax made some form of provisional agreement with Melbourne first. Reading between the lines of what Tripp said (Feb…"
20 minutes ago
More…