Gutherson not the answer!!

Clint is a great ball running winger/fullback, we need a specialist no 6 to help Corey!!!

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • So Norman has a bad game and it's Guth's fault?

    Guth played well as 6 last night.

    Actually he did brilliant considering it is a new position for him.

    Let's see how he is playing at 6 after a season under his belt

    Guth >> Bird. IMO
  • Gutho is fine, he's going great imo, patience will pay off.
  • Guth was just about our best player last night, his defence was outstanding.   Not sure what more people expect from him??? Norman had a quiet game and we dropped more ball than Matty Wade and it's all Guth fault.

    • We are expected to win every game Alan! Anything less just isn't acceptable! Lol. Sack gutho.
  • Agreed. At least 2 out the number 6,7 and 9 need to have some play making skills. We only got one.
  • It's possible Gutherson isn't the answer. However nothing we have seen this year has backed your argument. He has played well when the players around haven't constantly dropped it.

    Pretty simple to explain really: Nearly every half in the history of the game couldn't do anything without constant ball to build pressure and miss it up.
  • You are like a broken radio. Give it a rest .
  • You could have add this 1 sentence blog to other half a dozen similar blogs. It is very annoying.
  • There's nobody else.
    Foran and Norman was the plan.

    Foz left us without time to recruit late last season.

    You dopes calling out Arthur have absolutely no idea.
    • x100
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

CarloEEL2 replied to Rabz S's discussion Official: Parramatta Eels upgrade Teancum Brown
"I'm sorry 
I need a nickname or abbrev 
TC brown 
TB ???"
2 minutes ago
Zip zip replied to LB's discussion Eels interested in Barnett
"Not sold on him, especially at his age and high price tag. Tuivati and Teancum Brown are our future up front "
11 minutes ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"But difference is Munster and Holmes had cocaine, easy to see. Iongi has in his favour we have no 100% proof what is in what he was smoking. He could be tobacco.
Lets be fair we all know but how are they supposed to?"
12 minutes ago
RustyNuts replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Iongi might be the sacrificial pawn in this saga. Worst case he gets 2 games for bringing the game into disrepute. Munster and Holmes only got similar for coke, so definitely not worse than this. They may look at it as short term pain long term…"
17 minutes ago
More…