I have questions about this part of his statement
"Six weeks ago we went through a democratic election process and while others have sought to denigrate our club and our successful candidates, we have continued to push forward with a positive agenda. We are disappointed that some self-serving individuals are seeking to destabilise our club through the media during this period."
"These unwarranted attacks must cease."
Who are making the attacks, and how are they getting information?
I believe Dennis Fitzgerald has friends in the NRL who are delibrately trying to de stabalise
the current administration, but who are these operators and what are the incentives?
There must be moles within the club and the NRL and people who are willing to buy media attacks.
This involves money and coordination.
I believe all these attacks are linked.
The Chris Sandow saga
The Michael Gordon Saga
The Salary Cap Crisis
The Kieran Foran Crisis.
Somebody is clearly targeting the club but I don't understand what is in it for anyone else but Dennis and Spagnolo.
They must have some deep pockets.
Replies
"These unwarranted attacks must cease."
What on earth are you and Steve Sharp on about ?
The Michael Gordon Saga......I have not followed this so am uninformed to comment
But as for the rest
The Chris Sandow saga
The Salary Cap Crisis
The Kieran Foran Crisis.
......this is NO unwarranted attack
.....these are ALL Parramatta mistakes
What are you bozo's on about....it's the Parramatta Footy Club that has made these mistakes...Sandow was over-punished imo but is the least egregious of the 3
Sharp is trying to deflect blame
it's all on Parra....not any mythical unwarranted destabilising tactics
What has been reported has been the TRUTH
and the TRUTH is Parra has been incompetent
plain and simple
I agree, there is some incompetence, however, I also believe that there are some lunatics out there who don't realise that their time is over.
At least with Sharp I know that he has the Clubs best interest at heart.
It was a mistake hiring a rookie CEO, but Seward had a good resume and looked like a good choice.
In the end if the CEO makes bad choices, the board can only sack him and that is what they've done.
It is the CEO's job to ensure governance, and processes are maintained. That is why they are paid well.
The CEO failed and the board did all they could.
That doesn't mean their are not well funded individuals out there still trying to damage our club for their own agenda.