Eels vs Knights 3, 2, 1

Painful to watch but you have to applaud our defence. It was outstanding, and beating the Knights at home is one of the toughest road trips in the comp. But we need Moses back ASAP.

3. Mahoney

2. N. Brown

1. Gutherson

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Mahoney

    RCG

    NBrown

  • Reed

    Guth

    Jennings

  • agree

    3. Reed was absolutely outstanding today. Don't know what we'd have done without him!

    2. guts

    1. Nathan brown 

  • 3) Mahoney (shove that up ya pacheasawakka Harry Grant)

    2) Nathan Brown (the warrior is back)

    1) Gutho (because of course)

    • 👍

  • Agree with those Gray fox.

  • 3. Mahoney ( 66 tackles) and a try ( which if the game was fair dinkum advantage would have been played)

    2. Nathan Brown

    1. RCG and Gutho ( can't split them sorry)

  • 3-Mahoney

    2-N Brown

    1-Gutho,RCG

  • 3 - Reed Mahoney 

    2 - Gutherson

    1- R.C.G. & Nathan Brown

    Another disgraceful refereeing display

    • Have you ever watched a Parra game and not bagged the ref afterwards, Monto? You probably watch every game expecting every 50/50 to go our way and whinge every time it doesn't. We're nearly all one eyed here as far as Parra is concerned but you seem to say the same thing after every game and often follow it up with the claim that the whole comp is rigged.

      Give it a rest!

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hector replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Pod cast paul kent had Steve Gilles on on is management company as Lomax manager Dear Clinton he states it was the storm that contacted them regarding interest in Lomax not the other way round way around  (the he said they said)  is now out there…"
42 minutes ago
Tin Tim replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Parra can't & wont lose this, any outcome will be in the Eels favour. Second the Storm ain't the only team that going to ask about Lomax, you'll find whoever can come up with a good deal will win Lomax signature. "
43 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"A simple player swap for the sake of it is not good enough. Using Howarth as an example, does he make Parra better? Maybe a little, but he's no Lomax and Lomax will make Melbourne a lot better. Unless it's Munster, Stefano or Coates, no deal…"
44 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"The only scenario where Lomax has some standing and this is a complete hypothetical is if Parra are not acting in good faith. Say if Lomax already approached Parra and said he wanted to come back and Parra said " no, we don't want you anymore " OR…"
55 minutes ago
More…