You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
Andrew Webster in The Australianhttps://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/tripp-of-the-tongue-peter-vlandys-denies-favouritism-towards-melbourne-storm-and-zac-lomax/news-story/414f948cb92878c7c7f6022ac4083beeARL Commission chairman Peter V’landys has…
"Howarth and 200k transfer fee back in December and none of this would be happening. Storm just want everything their own way and that's not how life works. Two sides to the deal "
"If Lomax and strom had approached the eels in good faith and said look Zach is wanting to return to the nrl let's work out something that helps both of us. I'm sure that would have been a better path. Not sneaking behind the eels backs and crying to…"
"Is our club cheeky enough to equip Sparky with a blowtorch this year?"
Replies
I agree. Unless we are to release a winger or two, there is no point signing Mansour( I'd love to have him btw) when we need another top class prop for a more balanced team.
If Mansour was signed then it would be on good coin meaning there won't be much to throw at a good prop that can make a differance and improve us.
Mansour being a rep player would easily demand 500K plus.
OMFG so we let half our squad go to sign one winger??? Yeah that makes sense!
Mack you drongo , are you saying we should play the season with 6 men and sign Mansour ?
#SackMack
Saying we need a prop is irrelevant when one better than we already got probably isn't available. So if Mansour is available... No prop is available... We would be kicking ourselves to pass on a player like Mansour to end up with no one.
They don't have to be the best, or even near the best, they just have to be good, A'uva certainly is, and Hoffman will do until Guth is back and French slides back to the wing.
There aren't any middle forwards available that improve us significantly. Your point is moot.
Mansour isn’t available either , your point about Macklemore’s point is a moot .
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next