Dogrefs 12 beat Eels 6

In another great display by the Dogrefs, they were able to put a dent into the Eels aspirations for a top 4 birth. Man of the match undoubtedly goes to Dogref number 18 who finished the game with somewhere 23 whistle assists and puts him at the top of the end of season golden whistle awards. The turning point of the game was no doubt the impressive penalty try which gave the Dogrefs the victory.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • X2 

    • Agree totally  brisssy eel.  We won't get any 50/50 calls next week  either prob not for rest of the year.  The BA haters will just blame BA and turn a blind eye to the bad calls we receive. I'm proud  as punch with this team and what they have achieved this year

      • I... I.... I .....Parramate2 .  I am as proud as punch as you are too . Great expression. Cheers mate . 

    • I liked the part where they asked Billy Slater the worst offender in the history of the game yet never got penalised his thoughts . Billy’s response was to highlight how Moses cost his team two points . 

       

      Youd think Slater would’ve condemned the decision since he defended his rights to lead with the feet so often as just his “ technique “ 

  • Ref should’ve told Jackson to get back when he came in to harass Brown and have a go  - if he didn’t get back in his cage the ref should’ve immediately sent him to cool down. Hated that Brown was the lone eel amongst a pack of dogs after that -not the end of the world, but the whole thing didn’t look right considering where it started from under the refs nose.

  • Stop looking for excuses, we lost cause we played shit. If we were good enough none of these calls would matter. The fact we only managed 1 try with all the possession we had in their half is why we lost.

    • This reply was deleted.
      • Mate we just weren't good enough full stop. Take the refereeing out of it still don't matter cause our team wasn't good enough to win. It wasn't like we controversially lost, we didn't even look very threatening let alone scoring enough points. We were solidly beaten by a team on the bottom of the ladder.

    • This reply was deleted.
      • Does that mean you're also going to give yourself an uppercut cause you didn't like my opinion on a fan forum?? 

        • Lol. 

    • Rubish

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Tin Tim replied to Eelawarra's discussion EELS COACH JASON RYLES PUSHED TO SIGN OFF ON ZAC LOMAX’S RELEASE REQUEST - THIS IS WHY
"Everybody knew when Anasta said it on his show. So let's not make out you were the first to mention it. Second you all had the shit when the Eels were all over the news with what was happening internally, now you hear shit. It's all kept very quiet…"
15 minutes ago
Parrafan101 replied to Eelawarra's discussion EELS COACH JASON RYLES PUSHED TO SIGN OFF ON ZAC LOMAX’S RELEASE REQUEST - THIS IS WHY
"Dylan Brown is a drunk touching prick. Ryles is smart and he is kicking the dead wood that doesn't need to be in the team."
33 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Eelawarra's discussion EELS COACH JASON RYLES PUSHED TO SIGN OFF ON ZAC LOMAX’S RELEASE REQUEST - THIS IS WHY
"The subjectiveness hasn't changed Snotties perceptions of their abilities as players are very different to mine. One was picked to play Origin and for Australia (I believed he played the back end injured) and belies the end of season performances…"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Eelawarra's discussion EELS COACH JASON RYLES PUSHED TO SIGN OFF ON ZAC LOMAX’S RELEASE REQUEST - THIS IS WHY
"Reality bites hard. No one knows more about losing stars than the Panthers. You wouldn't describe Matt Cameron as a useless dope, because he couldn't convince this galaxy of stars to stay or because he follows Ivan Cleary's footy strategies.
 "
1 hour ago
More…