Eels Blogs

Replies

• 

  chips dangerously December 21, 2015 at 2:13am

  some have, some haven't. dogs, titans, tigers, newcastle sides are worse then last year.

  sharks, st george manly souths [burgess] parra brisbane [teo, roberts] penrith [merrin hiku martin] warriors[luke rts robson] have improved there squads.

  Cowboys Roosters Melbourne no change.
  • 

    ParraTime > chips dangerously December 21, 2015 at 6:06am

    Roosters losing their better half, without having a decent replacement. I think they have lost more than they have gained.
• 

  Eel team six December 21, 2015 at 4:24am

  I'd say Roosters are weaker. Maloney and RTS are big losses for them.
• 

  Ham Sammich December 21, 2015 at 8:58am

  And RTS, replacing him with no known fullback.
• 

  Kramerica December 21, 2015 at 9:11am

  I reckon most squads improve each year, on paper. Also the level of overall experience improves for alot of squads.

  Consistently performing to potential is the key for me.

  And, of course, it isn't exactly a level playing field. The draw plays a huge roll.

  The amount a team improves, on paper, from one year to the next should really be quite relevant to how shite they were the year before, how thier cap is being managed, and whether they have any cash.
• 

  Glenn Lifetime Eel December 21, 2015 at 10:19am

  Ironically the top teams have hardly bought anyone of note, teams such as Broncs and Cows. In fact Roosters have probably gone backwards, as have Dogs, and Storm with player losses. Rabbits an unknown quantity, strengthened their forwards but weaker in backs and with disquiet in the squad. Two teams well off the pace are Titans and West Tigers, both destined to fight out for wooden spoon along with Knights imo.