In the first 18 minutes of the 1st half. 

1. Raiders forward shoulder charge in a tackle = no penalty to Rabbits

2. Raiders voluntary tackle = no penalty to Rabbits

3. Rabbits back forces an involuntary line drop out, ball and arm hits the ground behind the try line = Raiders knock the ball out and are awarded a try. 

WTF

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Na, let them play

  • Raiders forwards are doing nothing. Souths are matching them easily. 

    • Rabbits are getting on top but both sides look tired. Wonder if the week off will favour the rabbits during the 2nd half, probably 60 minute mark onwards? 

  • This reply was deleted.
  • Sorry Choccy, fantastic game, let the players sort it out, just let them play.

    And anybody who thinks the game should outlaw stripping, I present that last 40 minutes, every possession was a contest, nothing was a given. It was brilliant.

     

    • Agreed about the ball stripping and the 2nd half entertainment. It was a very good game. Still think a foul is a foul and the refs were not doing there job in the 1st half. Souths bombed a few try opportunities in the 1st half and could have been up 14 to 18 nil - raiders try was not a try. 

  • The Roosters and Melbourne were light years ahead of other sides this year. I know Raiders beat Melbourne but everything went there way including a dropped ball in the last minute to win. It was similar to 2017 eels performance except they won.  They won’t beat them again. Parra were not far off Raiders or Souths but were never going to beat Melbourne or Roosters in a finals game. 

    • 100%.

      Watching this game, I can’t help but think what might’ve been. We definitely have more weapons in our arsenal than both these sides put together, it’s just a shame the raiders beat the Storm first week.

       

      • Storm wanted Raiders to beat them. The Storm are better without a week off.

  • They need to change that rule so if you don’t control it onto the foot it’s a knock on. Old fumbles Whighton was luck there. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Adam, I truly didn't get the Toyota comments. Like outside of saying BMW drivers drive like they're entitled to something, and giant Ute drivers are just plain annoying, both of which are factual and well-proven hypotheses, how does anyone's…"
4 seconds ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Chiefy, I didn't raise the moderation issue. It was thrown at me even though I'm not a mod. Can you imagine me moderating. I would ban you first, for misspelling Cheefy as Chiefy and for hinting that a wide mustache is cool. I mean obviously that…"
4 minutes ago
Davos Seaworth replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Which players would you target as a value investment?
"Cannot tackle "
6 minutes ago
Davos Seaworth replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Which players would you target as a value investment?
"So you just want ordinary players and young guys that Nathan Brown and a rookie coach can "develop". Stephen Kearny tried this approach. How'd that work out? It lead to a 10 year rebuilding that culminated in one prelim final and a GF. 
Try harder. …"
8 minutes ago
More…