In the first 18 minutes of the 1st half. 

1. Raiders forward shoulder charge in a tackle = no penalty to Rabbits

2. Raiders voluntary tackle = no penalty to Rabbits

3. Rabbits back forces an involuntary line drop out, ball and arm hits the ground behind the try line = Raiders knock the ball out and are awarded a try. 

WTF

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Na, let them play

  • Raiders forwards are doing nothing. Souths are matching them easily. 

    • Rabbits are getting on top but both sides look tired. Wonder if the week off will favour the rabbits during the 2nd half, probably 60 minute mark onwards? 

  • This reply was deleted.
  • Sorry Choccy, fantastic game, let the players sort it out, just let them play.

    And anybody who thinks the game should outlaw stripping, I present that last 40 minutes, every possession was a contest, nothing was a given. It was brilliant.

     

    • Agreed about the ball stripping and the 2nd half entertainment. It was a very good game. Still think a foul is a foul and the refs were not doing there job in the 1st half. Souths bombed a few try opportunities in the 1st half and could have been up 14 to 18 nil - raiders try was not a try. 

  • The Roosters and Melbourne were light years ahead of other sides this year. I know Raiders beat Melbourne but everything went there way including a dropped ball in the last minute to win. It was similar to 2017 eels performance except they won.  They won’t beat them again. Parra were not far off Raiders or Souths but were never going to beat Melbourne or Roosters in a finals game. 

    • 100%.

      Watching this game, I can’t help but think what might’ve been. We definitely have more weapons in our arsenal than both these sides put together, it’s just a shame the raiders beat the Storm first week.

       

      • Storm wanted Raiders to beat them. The Storm are better without a week off.

  • South's are doing well playing without a halfback,  Reynolds is ghosting his teammates 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

EelsAgeMe replied to Hell On Eels's discussion In the Wake of V’landys’ Backflips, the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"Your replies are as predictable as Lomax breaking a contract. "
2 minutes ago
Muttman replied to Hell On Eels's discussion In the Wake of V’landys’ Backflips, the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"Great read mate and thanks for posting. It is my understanding too, that Lomax agreed to join the Storm first. He only came back to the Eels as an afterthought, obviously based on legal advice. I've had similar discussions with lawyers who believe…"
31 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Roy tannous's discussion Payne haas joins rabbits
"The bunnies don't have a spine, most of their team is often injured or on the way out. Just signing haas doesn't make you competitive. Have to build it all up "
32 minutes ago
Zip zip replied to Hell On Eels's discussion In the Wake of V’landys’ Backflips, the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"Clearly Storm ain't exchanging anyone.
Parra should just suck it up, retire Matto on concussion basis, and use that money to welcome back Lomax, on an iron clad contract that makes sure he sees out his remaining 3 years.
Throw him in the backrow and…"
43 minutes ago
More…