Different Rules for Penreff

Turuva dropping the knees on Walsh and the crusher on Staggs were huge moments in the match. They are both Penalties in any game of NRL, except this one

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Yep. Has been for years now. Always inside the 10 but it's "line speed." Being allowed "blockers" for Clearys kick. I could go on all night about the shit they get away with.

    Absolute grub of a team 

  • I really thought Penrith were gone but they have a way of clawing back. The Broncos errors and silly plays cost them this win. I thought the ref was fairly good except for a few issues. I'm just really annoyed that the media will now go on about how great Penrith are and brag about they're better than the 80's Eels. Big chin Cleary will be hailed as an immortal and better than John's, Sterling, Etc ... get ready for the non stop barrage. 

    • Well, the way Cleary stood up the last 20 mins. You have to praise for him. 

  • Seriously blokes. The ref kept the whistle in his pocket all game as he should in a GF. 

    Can't you just suck it up and acknowledge the greatest comeback in a GF in history. 

    • Yep definitely have to give credit where credit is due even though it's painful 😭

    • Rules are rules, you can't pick and choose when you want to police them

      • They do it in SOO all the time. 
        The knees were unintentional, the  crusher was not! 
        I think You are seeing things through possibly"I hate the ruff eyes"

        • So 1 of the 2 were penalties then?

      • Actually you can

    • Definitely 

      and I have to say ( as a teacher ) Ivan was always a very respectful and decent player as I remember as a 50 year old .I'm not surprised he has a child who Carry's himself in the same way . I don't like the Luua of panthers but really you can't have a go at Nathan and how he works and plays 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

iamnot replied to Clintorian's discussion Lomax Update - Zac Lomax entered into preliminary contracts with R360 and the Melbourne Storm prior to being given his blessing by Parramatta
"I'm not sure how a court could determine what is a fair settlemt in the NRL sphere. Unless they use the value of Lomax contract as a baseline, or do you use the precedent set by the Dogs when they paid Brisbane $500k for Oloapu? There are far too…"
8 minutes ago
iamnot replied to Clintorian's discussion Lomax Update - Zac Lomax entered into preliminary contracts with R360 and the Melbourne Storm prior to being given his blessing by Parramatta
"We don't need to shop him at all. He can sit in NRL pergatory for three years haha"
12 minutes ago
Nitram replied to Clintorian's discussion Lomax Update - Zac Lomax entered into preliminary contracts with R360 and the Melbourne Storm prior to being given his blessing by Parramatta
"So Melbourne storm were dodgy and then still did the right thing and uploaded their dodgyness to the nrl portal thingy... This is comical stuff. The audacity and arrogance of the melbourne storm offends me as it should ALL nrl fans. This is our game…"
15 minutes ago
Muttman replied to Clintorian's discussion Lomax Update - Zac Lomax entered into preliminary contracts with R360 and the Melbourne Storm prior to being given his blessing by Parramatta
"Mate the NRL can't take over once the Court hands down its ruling. If the Courts decide the release is valid, that's the end of it. Vlandys, Melbourne and anyone else has to abide by the terms of the release. Because once a Judge rules it becomes…"
17 minutes ago
More…