Press encouraged Des and Des repeatedly and strongly claimed was not a head high tackle but a try saver and said the ref needed to review himself.
Both lied - see pick. Tackle was worse than Brown's penalty for headhigh try saver last week and the headhigh that got Paulo suspended
Replies
When Paulo was suspended they really did open a can of worms. This is worthy of a few weeks in the current climate. As is the careless one across RCGs chops. But I bet they all go unpunished.
Certainly didn't show this angle on the replays
When its us they show it when it is a team playing us they hide it
He should have been binned as well
Truth be known des is an alcoholic bitter man who like most sea eagle fans ,players or officials are one eyed and they don't hide it.Scum of a club and most notable one if their biggest grubs is a man that weighs more then the Michelin man Peter Peters
Des is right - it was a great try-saving tackle.
But head contact is not excused just because it's a try-saver.
A head-high try-saver is still head-high.
Suck it up, Manly. We've had to.
Suck shit Manly mongs
Arthur nailed it in his press conference. Yes Perham slipped but any forceful contact with the head is a penalty and has been all year. Look no further than Junior and D Brown.
The penalty count was only 3-2 with about 20 to go then Manly tried every dirty trick in the book to slow us down, turn the ball over etc. They are very lucky it wasn't a lot worse than that
Absolutely, I am not sure how that hit on RCG wasn't even a penalty
Correct, great answer from BA.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next