But would the Storm offer Cronk an immediate release?
My original thinking was that if Cronk was released, it would mean that the Storm wouldn't have to pay the rest of his salary for this year and that perhaps that might help them for next year. I still don't know exactly how that is all going to work? How payments that are over for this year factor into next year's salary. There was some discussion about this when it all happened but I think that might have been related to paying out contracts they don't honour next year or something.
Anyway, even if you leave all that behind if you know Cronk is not going to be here next year and that you're intending to bring up your NYC half as an example, wouldn't you just say to Parra take him now so we can start the re-building process and use the rest of the year to blood our young bloke. That's what I would be doing.
On the flipside, you'd have to question whether the NRL would allow it as it would certainly be seen as an unfair advantage to us? On the other hand, let's say we released a player like Krisnan?
Anyway, no chance I reckon for any number of reasons, and personally I wouldn't want it to happen, but hey its Friday afternoon.
Replies
'Cronk's a donk!'.
Do I want to swap players who bleed Blue and Gold for someone from the Melbourne Storm? Not on your life.