Could we have had David Fifito 2 years ago?

Reports suggest that David Fifito  agreed to join the eels as a 16 year old but at the last minute the club baulked at paying a $100,000 sign on fee believing this was excessive for a 16 year old who had yet to play NRL. If this is true it is a devestating loss

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Yep

    lost over $30k off cap

  • More quality work from Steve Sharp and his cronies, didn't want to spend 100k on one of the best juniors in the game but happy to blow millions on their court fees.   Thank fark he can't hurt the club anymore.

    • Was not on Steve sharps watch

      Bernie’s

      • Fafitia was 16, he is slmost 20.  It was 2016 when that gimp was still here.   Can't blame Bernie for this one.

        • I think the club was a bit busy in 2016, and the salary cap was a bit full...

          I take the point though - he would have been useful.

        • It was 2017

          i remember commenting on It at the time

          • He was 16 at the time, he's now almost 20.  It was 2016 and under the plumbers watch.  

      • Bernie didn't start until 2017.

  • If we spent 100k on him 2 years ago would we still have D Brown or Mahoney?  Not sure how 2nd tier and junior salary cap works.

    Also 100k is massive money for a junior who could take the money for 2 years, get home sick and then go back to brisbane once eligible for NRL.  The new rules mean players he couldn't play NRL until 18 so it's easy in hindsight to bag the club seeing how he developed but probably was a smart decision when made 2 years ago

     

    • LOL yeah good call, we saved 100k but are now offering him 4m over 5 years.   Yeah such a smart decision......

       

      Well if he was at Parramatta he'd be probably still be stuck at Wenty stuck behind Plodders like Tepai.

       

      Luckily for him he never came to this laugh factory.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Blue Eel replied to Charbs's discussion Storm to face hefty bill if star loses Eels court fight
"Surely a reporter is putting this on V'Landys and is asking the hard questions. This is breaking so many NRL rules, salary caps, contracts, player interference, no wonder the Eels wouldn't take him back. Surely someone with integrity within the NRL…"
1 minute ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Charbs's discussion Storm to face hefty bill if star loses Eels court fight
"Surely it goes on the cap if the storm are paying his legal bill
V'Landy's should be fired for his role in this debacle."
18 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Charbs's discussion Storm to face hefty bill if star loses Eels court fight
"How good would it be if the Storm lose the case, and then the NRL consider that part of Storm's salary cap as payment to Lomax 😆"
39 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion SMH Report: Storm, Raiders & Perth Allegedly All Interested In Signing Lomax
"Right so they are getting to the point of hushing up Parra. Chan is ok but I would want a Flegg talent too.
Howarth is a real possibility if Lomax takes his Centre spot. Push for him and take Matto."
43 minutes ago
More…