Could we be signing Barrett and Kimmorley?

Just to provide an update on the intrigue over signings. 

Firstly, my information remains that Barrett will sign for next year and that it will be announced next week. I just read jpav's comment that the Sunday Telegraph is reporting likewise.

However, and this is what has been doing my head in, is that I've had people close to the Dogs camp tell me that Kimmorley is a done deal, too.

Which is exactly where I was when I first reported this nearly a week ago and why I was hedging my bets a bit in the initial report.

My initial thoughts was we couldn't possibly be signing both of them. However, I'm starting to re-think...

If you look at out Top 25 for this year, we had six hooker/halves - Mortimer, Robson, K Keating, Humble, M Keating, Mitchell. We'll need that many again next year, especially given we won't have the fallback position of Mateo to six if needed.

Right now, we have four signed for next year - Keating gone and Mitchell almost no chance of being re-signed. So there are definitely two spots in the halves up for grabs.

From what I'm hearing neither Barrett or Kimmorley are going to be on massive money. You have to think we had $400k up our sleeve if we were going to make a bid a bid for Cronk or Inglis. I think we were also still in play for Cronk when we offered KK a deal about the $150k mark. We've also had a few kids really step up in NYC - like O'Hanlon and Sio who we can confidently make a part of our top 25 of cheap dollars. We've got a fair bit still in the kitty, I think.

I believe a central part of Anderson's recruitment strategy has been to shift dollars into our key positions. Hence why players like Eric Grothe and Feleti Mateo were not offered serious contracts because he doesn't want big money spent on positions like wing or lock. I think money has been freed specifically for the halves and I think we could likely get the two of them for not much north of $500k, which I believe is definitely doable and was what was budgeted for when we were targeting Cronk.

And I can't help but think that Barrett and Kimmorley who have played together at Origin level would be attracted to the opportunity of one last year going around in the same team.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • That would be a match made in heaven.
  • Phil, I have been waiting for your news all week.

    While I am devastated to be losing KK, especially after his reported performance tonight, it does appear that some sort of plan was in motion.

    Hopefully it all works out. I would definitely love to have Barrett in the blue and gold.

    Please keep us posted!!
  • great article as always. both would be great at parra. where would mortimer go? so cronk is definitely out of parra's sights. if inglis signs with broncos i get the feeling another big 4 would go as well. but thats another story
    • I think KK showed last night that no matter what number you are wearing, you can be an integral part of the team performance. If we got Barrett and Kimmorley you'd think Mortimer would swallow some pride, do a Joey Johns (the good Joey) and play 9 so Kimmorley can play 7.
  • dont like either player bth about to retire and that dosent help our long time future signing bth for 1yr contract ea waste of dollars i reckon may as well just go offer big $$$$$ to cronk and be done with it
  • if this does happen i would still like to see mortimer on the run on team, you cant learn from not playing with these guys. Kimmorley at 7 mortimer at 6 and barret either at lock or 14.
    • parra why waste nearly 400k on bth player though for 1 yr as i said may as well chase cronk for 2yr deal
  • From what I've heard we offered Cronk a 5yr deal but he knocked it back. He doesn't want to leave the cheaters and given that Inglis is now gone, I'm sure they'll keep the other 3
    • At the end of the day you really don't want somebody who doesn't want to be in your team. Obviously things are pretty passionate within the Melbourne camp at the moment as they stick together and try to keep the sinking boat afloat. It would be crazy for Cronk to come out and say he is keen to go to Parramatta. I suspect there is a more than usual dislike for the Eels coming from him though. He seemed offended that he would be linked to our team for next year.
    • I also heard that there is scheduled meeting with Cronk and manager Gavin Orr next week.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Blue Eel replied to Yehez's discussion The James Hardie Centre of Excellence
"I can only suggest that one recognises the past and embraces a better future. We must learn from past mistakes to be better. So many companies have terrible terrible histories but now serve the communities as outstanding citizens and leaders in…"
7 minutes ago
Darren Munro replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Wayne shuts down cobbo link.
"That would be a great get. Great little player."
26 minutes ago
Darren Munro replied to Adam's discussion PAYNE HASS
"We needa  bigger version of Jack Williams to play middle. Jack to the edge. I hope the rumors of carrigan are true. The Broncos will have plenty of players to off load. So we will see if the eels pick at the carcass.  Hass would be 1.4 plus I would…"
33 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Parra_Greg's discussion Reed Mahoney
"Cumberland Eel, I just shake my head, I do wonder if you just stop for a second and think about what you said.Gould is a cancer to any club. That right there is why us as a club are 30 something years from a premiership.
You might not like him, but…"
56 minutes ago
More…