Told he wasn’t a half back -(probably correctly)
But if Cronk plays and can’t make the 80
Then Matterson could fill in
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"FMD. I thought he was smart enough to be neutral in this. But here he is throwing his full support behind the Melbourne Storm publicly and we now have the private messages too. This is astonishing. "
"At least there are now only two options for V'Landys when the court makes its determination.
After V'Landys stupidly sided with Storm in saying $300k is fair, if the court goes that way then every NRL fan bar Storm dimwits will say the fix was in.…"
After V'Landys stupidly sided with Storm in saying $300k is fair, if the court goes that way then every NRL fan bar Storm dimwits will say the fix was in.…"
"You forget, Mitchy, all the help the Orange turd gets from Russia and The Pedo Ring. That's your guy!"
"Yep he said it can be used for their junior development
He said exactly it was a great deal."
He said exactly it was a great deal."
Replies
Robbo would be more likely to move either Mitch Aubusson or Victor Radley into the halves than Matterson.
He would be a true half
or would he be a quarter since he is already a half
No never heard of him, but I reckon Ryan Matterson could.
IF that happens it is more likely Keary to 7 with Matto 6
The discussion is whether or not he is likely to play in the halves if Cronk is not available - not if he is a quality half.
I don't think matterson would of come as far as he has if he stayed at parra. Roosters are better at developing players. we have been absolutely diabolical in that for the last 10 years pretty much since fitzy left.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next