Clod- Hopper Coach Cleary Contradicts Himself.

The first thing Cleary told the West Tigers players was:- "If you are not on the bus you are off the bus." Then he added:-" if you are off the bus you can go out the front door." The very next day Mitchell Moses told the West Tiger`s administration that he wanted an immediate release to go to the Eels because he had agreed to the Eel`s terms for a contract.Cleary, when informed, refused Mose`s request saying no one is leaving until the end of the year--clearly in breach of what he said less than twenty four previously. He is not a man of his word. One wonders what the West players will make of that contradiction? The reports in today media suggesting that Woods and Teddy would be leaving to go the the Dogs seems to indicate those players don`t think too much of that contradiction. Also, today, Cleary says he will try and get Moses to renege on his signing with the Eels! Is such an action legal? It would  be doubtful in my opinion. A little thing like that would not worry Cleary apparently.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • They won't release him to us when we are playing them this week.

    And Yes Robert. There is a 10 day cooling off period with NRL contracts.

    Just like purchasing property in NSW where you can have a 5/10 day cooling off period.

    People pull out of contracts in the cooling off period all the time for a multitude of reasons.

    I think we will get Moses, and in time for our clash against Panthers, but what would I know.

  • For a start he wouldn't be the first player to backflip on an agreement. Second the Tigers have lost Brooks, why would he allow Moses to walk out, only to come back & help Parra beat the Tigers? Moses ain't going to arrive and solve our problems. I'm going to feel for the kid when or if he makes a mistake or two, some on here will make sure will all know he didn't want him here!!!
    • Brooks is backflipping to sign with Storm.

    • I meant Brooks is injured.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

RustyNuts replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Personally I think the Lomax team are trying to show a history of releasing players without non-compete clauses. "These 6 didn't have them so why should I" will be the Lomax defence. Is definitely clutching at straws, but that's all they seem to be…"
1 minute ago
Johnny Suede posted a discussion
As per the SMH's Adrian Proszenko  https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/nrl-dragged-into-lomax-legal-stous... NRL has been dragged into the Zac Lomax legal stoush after Parramatta issued an urgent subpoena to obtain…
12 minutes ago
MeelK replied to LB's discussion Eels interested in Barnett
"Yes but don't discount the impact he had on the club in setting standards, especially defensively."
15 minutes ago
macybrown replied to LB's discussion Eels interested in Barnett
"Agree with you too poppa ...he'd bring big beau vibes:)"
22 minutes ago
More…