Careful with Zero Tackle

I have just had to remove a blog posted by BEM that was originally from Zero Tackle.

This is not because I am stifling team discussion or anything of the like.

It was brought to my attention that Zero Tackle had falsified Jim Sarantinos' quotes. He made those comments last year, not this week.

It's not BEM's fault, but it is a reminder not to trust a very questionable site like Zero Tackle.

Falsified quotes or stories, if republished here, have the potential to bring legal attention to the site.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • It makes sense as why would any media outlet actually discuss BA's future after one bad loss? If we lose to the Roosters then Souths then yeah maybe.

  • To be fair Zero Tackle often has more journalistic integrity than the main NRL journos. They would have just simply made up the gist of the quotes and said they heard them through an "unnamed source".

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

parra supporter replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"1) don't hate or love it. As long as there's no delay waiting for coaches orders for kick or receive I'm not overly against it.
2) not the biggest fan. It'll see players play 18-19th man over several weeks and get no game time for nrl or cup. …"
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"If we kick deep and they get to the 40, that would be on us.   They shouldn't be getting near half way"
3 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"I know mate its all about entertainment and gambling."
4 hours ago
Joeyboyz replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"That's exactly the type of scenario that they want.
 "
4 hours ago
More…