Careful with Zero Tackle

I have just had to remove a blog posted by BEM that was originally from Zero Tackle.

This is not because I am stifling team discussion or anything of the like.

It was brought to my attention that Zero Tackle had falsified Jim Sarantinos' quotes. He made those comments last year, not this week.

It's not BEM's fault, but it is a reminder not to trust a very questionable site like Zero Tackle.

Falsified quotes or stories, if republished here, have the potential to bring legal attention to the site.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • It makes sense as why would any media outlet actually discuss BA's future after one bad loss? If we lose to the Roosters then Souths then yeah maybe.

  • To be fair Zero Tackle often has more journalistic integrity than the main NRL journos. They would have just simply made up the gist of the quotes and said they heard them through an "unnamed source".

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Stevo replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"The NRL are involved because Melbourne got them involved with threats of penalities if Parra didnt comply"
4 hours ago
Parra fan on The Hill replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"In return for lomax we should ask for the storm to buy all our Top 30 a boat. The boys can then rip up Parra River with donuts"
5 hours ago
Parra fan on The Hill replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"We should. He'll be out of puff and sorts. Target him all game long."
5 hours ago
Blaze replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Lomax isnt on our cap, hes was released and cap space freed. his breaking the condition of his release, we should not be settling for a mid level player unless its multiple players.
if we were smart he would not be playing rd1 against us either. "
6 hours ago
More…