Eels Blogs

Careful with Zero Tackle

Posted by SuperEel 22 on June 15, 2022 at 5:16am in Media Reports

I have just had to remove a blog posted by BEM that was originally from Zero Tackle.

This is not because I am stifling team discussion or anything of the like.

It was brought to my attention that Zero Tackle had falsified Jim Sarantinos' quotes. He made those comments last year, not this week.

It's not BEM's fault, but it is a reminder not to trust a very questionable site like Zero Tackle.

Falsified quotes or stories, if republished here, have the potential to bring legal attention to the site.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

★

Votes: 0

Email me when people reply –

Replies

LB June 15, 2022 at 7:25am

It makes sense as why would any media outlet actually discuss BA's future after one bad loss? If we lose to the Roosters then Souths then yeah maybe.
The Captain June 15, 2022 at 8:12am

To be fair Zero Tackle often has more journalistic integrity than the main NRL journos. They would have just simply made up the gist of the quotes and said they heard them through an "unnamed source".

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

mongolian trotting duck replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation

" pretty sure the nrl dont have any shares of melbourne anymore"

Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to EA's discussion Eels Announce Junior Teams

"If there was two players I'd extended until 2031 its Fletcher & Ryda"

Hell On Eels replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Spagnolo launches another campaign to undermine the club

"This Roy move is more poorly thought out than Operation Barbarossa.
The Constitution safeguards against worst-case scenarios, including a Roy-type who spends 21 years signing up every Tom, Dick, and Harry, and the neighbourhood dog to his cause.…"