Careful with Zero Tackle

I have just had to remove a blog posted by BEM that was originally from Zero Tackle.

This is not because I am stifling team discussion or anything of the like.

It was brought to my attention that Zero Tackle had falsified Jim Sarantinos' quotes. He made those comments last year, not this week.

It's not BEM's fault, but it is a reminder not to trust a very questionable site like Zero Tackle.

Falsified quotes or stories, if republished here, have the potential to bring legal attention to the site.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • It makes sense as why would any media outlet actually discuss BA's future after one bad loss? If we lose to the Roosters then Souths then yeah maybe.

  • To be fair Zero Tackle often has more journalistic integrity than the main NRL journos. They would have just simply made up the gist of the quotes and said they heard them through an "unnamed source".

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Trent replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"What would they say if they said he's welcome to finish his contract at parra that would be interesting to see the response "
20 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
""but cannot — for now — see nine emails sent to his player's agent."....yummy. 
"documents were provided to the four-time NRL premiers"...they referred to us as 4x prem...I mean it's pretty funny but i'll take it.
"Melbourne Storm was granted extra…"
22 minutes ago
Eli Stephens posted a discussion
58 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Deardon Rumour
"yes"
2 hours ago
More…