Careful with Zero Tackle

I have just had to remove a blog posted by BEM that was originally from Zero Tackle.

This is not because I am stifling team discussion or anything of the like.

It was brought to my attention that Zero Tackle had falsified Jim Sarantinos' quotes. He made those comments last year, not this week.

It's not BEM's fault, but it is a reminder not to trust a very questionable site like Zero Tackle.

Falsified quotes or stories, if republished here, have the potential to bring legal attention to the site.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • It makes sense as why would any media outlet actually discuss BA's future after one bad loss? If we lose to the Roosters then Souths then yeah maybe.

  • To be fair Zero Tackle often has more journalistic integrity than the main NRL journos. They would have just simply made up the gist of the quotes and said they heard them through an "unnamed source".

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion NRL reject dispensation
"Bring back Fitzy"
13 seconds ago
paul taylor replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion NRL reject dispensation
"Disappointing to be honest.   I know South Sydney had a similar injury crisis last year and they werent granted one either. YES, foul play involved but they dont hand them out willy nilly.   If we lose another back in next few weeks it will be…"
35 seconds ago
CarloEEL2 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion NRL reject dispensation
"Wow 
wouldn't it be a shame if someone leaked some documents from lomax case like text messages to someone like smh Kate mc clymont 🤔"
4 minutes ago
Hector Bob Down replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion NRL reject dispensation
"NO"
12 minutes ago
More…