According to Fox News , both Robinson and Lussick will be OK with an early guilty plea. Thank heaves for that. But why? if it happened two or three weeks ago both would have been gone for some time. Darcy`s hit on the South`s bloke was worse than Paulo`s tackle on Ballin. Has the NRL changed again? After all, the crowds are down this year and crucifying the Eels--Junior Paulo eg -- would mean smaller crowds from one of the best drawing clubs in the league. Has Greenburge been taped on the shoulder?
I noticed in the East`s U20 result a certain J Lussick scored a try. Was this 'our' J Lussick? If it was we might lose Darcy to the Chooks regardless of the rumbles about their salary cap. Ham, this you your responsibility.
Replies
Fox Sports said both ok to play with early plea. What the...?
Finally the judiciaries inconsistency has worked in our favour. One auto pick please.
I take that back.
J Lussick is now a Rooster.
Shite ! and damm! He was quiet promising. Darcy will be shaking hands with the East`s coach next year? Just when he is coming good as a prop.
Robinson gets 2 weeks with early Plea 3 if he challenges it
Should we go for broke or keep quiet. I think we should challenge the charge, if that fails go for down grade. The Eels policy should be to front the judiciary on each and every charge with the idea that they will get sick of the site of us. Pester the life out of them.
Possibly a stupid question but if we challenge the charge and it's unsuccessful, aside from an extra week added to his suspension, is there any negatives to the Eels?
For example: do we only have a number of challenges per year or can we just challenge everything?
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next