Burt to interchange hooker in 2010

I have been thinking with our quality of backs in 2010, we should consider using Burt as a interchange hooker to provide spark around the rucks when defence is getting tired. It also has the advantage of if any of our outside backs get injured in a game he could come on and fill that role too.He has all the skills to be a success for the interchange role, he can catch, pass, run and kick.Whats everyones thoughts on this

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • To be honest, he's ideally suited to 5/8th as he possesses a good kicking and passing game, and has the vision to put players into space. Unfortunately, as would be the case at hooker, if he played that close to the action, he'd be monstered in defence and would be forced to make so many tackles such that it would blunt any effectiveness in attack.

    I think you'll find DA and the conditioning staff will attempt to convert Reddy into a rangy, free running interchange lock forward in the mould of a Steve Menzies. Whether it works or not remains to be seen.
    • I personally don't think Joel will work in the forwards. I think its a string that he should add to his bow as he is your absolutely ideal utility but he is not an aggressive defender, he's a technical defender.

      If you compare to Ben Smith, who was always a get up in your face and monster the opposition defender - which is why I was always very confident he would make the transition to forward. A lot of Joel's tackles he looks like he's missed but he does enough to bring them down.

      Also if I remember rightly, Joel put down his injury-free year to not trying to bulk up. He said he tried to add bulk the previous year and his body didn't copy very well with it.
      • Completely agree... while at times he doesnt look like it reddy knows exactly what he needs to do and he knows how to finish better than anyone else in the game
  • I think he could be hidden in defence and maybe push k keating into 9 for defence as he is a bit tougher and more robust then Burty. Your idea has merit as well but i think that what he has done with Ben Smith already and they will be very similar. It is killing me already bring on the next footy season. My team for round 1 next season would be. Not sure about the rotation of props as we could make a case for any of those starting, it is a very good luxury to have.
    1 Hayne
    2 Inu
    3 Reddy
    4 Tahu
    5 Grothe
    6 Mortimer
    7 K keating
    13 Mateo
    12 Ben Smith
    11 Hindy
    10 Moi Moi
    9 M keating
    8 Poore

    14 Burt
    15 Cayless
    16 Shackleton
    17 Mannah
    • we cant have our captain on the bench
      • yes you can when they are a front rower, whats the difference with having him come on after 20 mins as opposed to have him come off after 20 mins? caylo never plays 80mins anyway.
        • The more I think about it, the more I think he'll start in the second row. This is how I would rotate them. 8. Poore 10. Moimoi 11. Hindmarsh 12. Cayless. I think you take Moimoi off after 15-20 mins and replace him with say Ben Smith/Feleti and Cayless moves up into front row. You don't have to make anymore replacements in the backrow. Mannah replaces Poore at about 25-30 mins and then you bring Fuifui back on for a final 10 minutes in place of Cayless and you're starting the second half with him as well. Hook him after 15 and replace him with Poore and then bring him back for the final 10-12 minutes. Cayless replaces Mannah after 15 mins and finishes the match.

          Means you get a good 55 to 60 minutes out of Fuifui but he only has to do around 15 minutes at any one time to keep him fresh. I've only made 6 interchanges there as well.
  • id really like to see tom humble at 14 his pace out of dummy half will be very dangerous and he has all the skills of jarryd hayne , the question is can he pull it off in first grade u never know if u dont try.
  • i think it is a very big call on humble, Burt is a very experienced first grader and humble is very unproven, Will like to see him suceed but i think comparing him to Burt (a guy with 10 years experience in grade) and Hayne (Australian rep).
    Teams hide players in defence every week ie Lockyer for Brisbane, he has had a "protector" for a lot of his career since he has moved to 5/8 and we could do the same with someone like Ben Smith, Hindy or Shackleton for Luke Burt when he comes on.
    • You can't hide a hooker - they're in the middle of the ruck and are expected to defend the ruck stoutly!
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

JB. Prints of Parra replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion If Galvin ends up at the Dogs, what then?
"Dogs want DCE not Galvin"
2 minutes ago
LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion If Galvin ends up at the Dogs, what then?
"Sexton back to Titans surprises me, he should say get stuffed.
He could be a candidate for Perth though."
17 minutes ago
Uncle Wizardssleeve- Indigenous Elder-Freemason Hunter -He/Him replied to Parra_Greg's discussion WE STILL TOO CRAP FOR VEGAS
"They'd be smuggling back one of those new high tech kebab vans with the robot meat slicers inside . They've been banned from Australia as they are worried about the robots  being corrupted and being used for driveby shootings  and going on the…"
58 minutes ago
KingGutho replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion If Galvin ends up at the Dogs, what then?
"If we don't get Galvin it's not a big deal, our priority at the moment is middles, I would get some one like Te Marie Martin on a 1-2 year deal, and bring our own halves up from SG ball 
I think the dogs will get Galvin too."
1 hour ago
More…