Brown facing two weeks

Not sure if this has been discussed, but Nathan Brown facing two weeks for his hot on Radley. Got to love his enthusiasm but its no good if he is rubbed out for weeks at a time. He's only just come back.Does he tone it down and we risk losing his aggression.Maybe the judiciary need to see it as it was a nothing tackle, Player wasn't knocked out, no intent , free to play, but no he'll be out again. Noticed Gutho copped a knock, no replay no penalty? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • He'll get two weeks because his history and because he wears a Parra jersey

    • This. Gutho's head.chopped nothing.

       

  • He gets two weeks whether he takes the guilty plea or fights and loses. He should definitely fight it. It was clearly accidental, player was falling etc. His legal team will be able to highlight other tackles from the weekend that attracted no charges at all like Mitchell and the hit on Gutho. Definitely worth a shot. 

  • On another note, Victor Radley, what a player, seriously where do Chooks get these guys, wiki says he grew up in Bronte so they can call him a jnr i guess.just an annoying hungry aggressive player.wish he was ours.

  • We got to fight it. Accepting these bs decisions causes  trouble later. Top teams always fight it when they have a case.

  • In the DT today says we are going to fight it and are dirty he was even charged. 

  • Confirmed, Brown will be contesting the grading at the judiciary. He's got some precedent on his side with the fact Radley wasn't charged at all and neither was Mitchell. No lose situation really. If he loses, well it's the two weeks anyway, if he wins then he's not suspended.

    • This reply was deleted.
      • Well, then, all the more reason to argue for the downgrade.

      • Hang on, so Radley got charged by match review but the ref ignored the high shot at the time , is that the same tackle?please remind me of the context of the game ie. Scoreline at the time? I remember we were struggling to make it out of our end and Guth stayed down after but still no penalty. 

        • This reply was deleted.
          • I'm serious I need to fuel the fire, do you know the minute mark and score at the time?and the Lane elbow wasn't that whilst trying to score IE. Another penalty try?

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Coryn Hughes replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"What I think you have to take into account is the Dogs are far from the finished product.
Galvin was absolute the right move to make for them absolutely.
They may not be championship material now but they are setup for long term success not instant…"
3 minutes ago
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER replied to Eels2025's discussion Jake Averillo & Josh Kerr
"If we sign him i put in straight in the centres drop Penisini have Simmons and Averillo as our centres 
1  longi
2 fox
3 Simmons 
4 Averillo 
5 Lomax 
6 Doueihi  bit of luck
7 Moses "
11 minutes ago
Parramatta Tragic replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"Couldn't agree more. It's like the Footy Gods have intervened. The "natural" decision was for Galvin to return to the Eels. No pressure, slips into 5/8 and time to build his game and help the Parramatta revival. Instead he drank Gus's Kool Aid and…"
18 minutes ago
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER replied to Eels2025's discussion Jake Averillo & Josh Kerr
"Yes i did read it first so I ring up my sauce and he told me Parramatta been trying to get Jake Averillo for a while now 
They even tryed to sign him before July dead line
But Dolphins said no because Broncos didn't want to let go of Cobbo early 
So…"
18 minutes ago
More…