Brown facing two weeks

Not sure if this has been discussed, but Nathan Brown facing two weeks for his hot on Radley. Got to love his enthusiasm but its no good if he is rubbed out for weeks at a time. He's only just come back.Does he tone it down and we risk losing his aggression.Maybe the judiciary need to see it as it was a nothing tackle, Player wasn't knocked out, no intent , free to play, but no he'll be out again. Noticed Gutho copped a knock, no replay no penalty? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • He'll get two weeks because his history and because he wears a Parra jersey

    • This. Gutho's head.chopped nothing.

       

  • He gets two weeks whether he takes the guilty plea or fights and loses. He should definitely fight it. It was clearly accidental, player was falling etc. His legal team will be able to highlight other tackles from the weekend that attracted no charges at all like Mitchell and the hit on Gutho. Definitely worth a shot. 

  • On another note, Victor Radley, what a player, seriously where do Chooks get these guys, wiki says he grew up in Bronte so they can call him a jnr i guess.just an annoying hungry aggressive player.wish he was ours.

  • We got to fight it. Accepting these bs decisions causes  trouble later. Top teams always fight it when they have a case.

  • In the DT today says we are going to fight it and are dirty he was even charged. 

  • Confirmed, Brown will be contesting the grading at the judiciary. He's got some precedent on his side with the fact Radley wasn't charged at all and neither was Mitchell. No lose situation really. If he loses, well it's the two weeks anyway, if he wins then he's not suspended.

    • This reply was deleted.
      • Well, then, all the more reason to argue for the downgrade.

      • Hang on, so Radley got charged by match review but the ref ignored the high shot at the time , is that the same tackle?please remind me of the context of the game ie. Scoreline at the time? I remember we were struggling to make it out of our end and Guth stayed down after but still no penalty. 

        • This reply was deleted.
          • I'm serious I need to fuel the fire, do you know the minute mark and score at the time?and the Lane elbow wasn't that whilst trying to score IE. Another penalty try?

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poupou Escobar replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never wanted Pezet as a long-term signing- Chammas
"These guys are pro athletes, not office workers. Their reputation is part of what motivates them.
As for Papalii, he will still be at the club in 2027. Moses will probably miss half the year so Papalii will get plenty of game time."
34 seconds ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never wanted Pezet as a long-term signing- Chammas
"Why? Did u watch Anastas podcast? Highly unlikely he would move to Parra for one year to play reggies when he could do that in Melbourne."
11 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never wanted Pezet as a long-term signing- Chammas
"I think Joash will start. Pezet will start in reserve grade "
54 minutes ago
Parra fan on The Hill replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never wanted Pezet as a long-term signing- Chammas
"This whole "Next Parra 5/8" debacle has left a really nasty taste of anger, frustration, humiliation and despair.
We lose Talagi because DBrown was signed on. He then decides to leave for Newie. Galvin's on the market but we can't convince him to…"
55 minutes ago
More…