Broncos vs souths

I'm not one to blame the referees but f#@k me. Broncos were handed that game.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Arm holding the ball is on the ground so tackle is completed and was clearly a no try. So how the fuck was that not a tackle? And then there is the knock on by Milford before he kicks the winning field goal. Fuck me dead. This game is seriously rigged. 

  • I want see replay as mate rekons ref told bunker to check if Milford passed off ground or after tackled but they still cleared try.
    Disgraceful refs tonight in both games. Just proves that refs favour teams expected to be in top 4. How Canberra were allowed less then 10 meters from Walker for conversion and mouthing off as they were is against rules. I wonder if they would have given Walker 2nd shot if he missed.
    As for broncos game dodgy try followed by field goal after knock on saw broncos home.
  • Disgraceful...and sums up a bad week for the game IMO...
  • Totally agree
  • Complete farce and this all without needing to mention the Sims try.

    • Sims try was fine by the rules. If listen to commentators on fox they made it out it no try but by book and rules it's OK. South's played at the ball while Sims was outside 10m of South's player who played at ball. Once South's touch it every player is onside unless they were in front of the the play ball.
    • Who on Souths actively played at the ball? Not Sutton and he was the only player it touched
  • How good is that Angus Crichton.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to LB's discussion Eels interested in Barnett
"You really think Barnett would accept a CO? I mean he has plenty of suitors and is an Origin forward, he wont accept a CO from us."
8 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Eels interested in Barnett
"He will be 33 next year, that is my thinking. We are looking for a Paulo replacement yet are looking at someone who is a year younger? No denying his talent, he is an incredible player and if we don't have de Belin next year then yeah he would be…"
10 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Eels interested in Barnett
"He would be 33 next year. But yeah."
16 minutes ago
Tin Tim replied to LB's discussion Eels interested in Barnett
"He an asset, our young forwards are playing out of their skin because of De-Bellin & Paulo they are teaching them the way. It needs to continue with an experienced prop that will teach them how to be professional & mentally strong. No better than…"
1 hour ago
More…