Replies

  • That would be weird given all the grooming of RTS for the position.
    • x2 even Tupou would be better than Boyd at FB. Maybe they want him on the wing.

  • Yeh I heard Watmough to Eels was a done deal too, can't be sure where I heard it though
  • I did not know Wayne Bennett was going to the Roosters

  • If this is allowed it will continue to make a mockery of the cap. I realise that mini and Sbw have left, but the Roosters have players that have become rep stars in the last two years and still the cap isn't biting. If they are allowed to sign him they will be allowed to have a back line of representative players - every one of them! I don't care whether they are in or out of form, it is the value that they must be paid. Then look at the calibre of their forwards. Jake Friend would be the maroons rake if Smith wasn't around. cordner, Guerra, Nu'uausala, Moa, Wairea-Hargreaves. Ridiculous!
  • Amazing how some teams can stretch the cap while over clubs struggle to put together a competitive team.

  • I'm surprised at this I heard in the news last week that the Broncos under Bennett's instructions are moving "heaven and hell" to squeeze Boyd in that why the Polar Bear got moved out!
  • Who cares. Boyd did nothing at Newcastle and is made to look good in origin by inglis... I mean seriously anyone that can run and catch would look good on the wing in the QLD side. 

  • Surprised if this is true as the umbilical cord to Bennett is yet to be severed. We will just have to wait and see if or when it is confirmed.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Coryn Hughes replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jdb junior paulo 👉🚪👋
"This is where the backrowers are so important there a halves best friend if there hole running hitting outside in targeting defenders running a fade basically it gives the halves reads and options that's what we want to look out for around Pezet…"
11 minutes ago
D_STOFFBERG replied to Herbert Hamilton's discussion Fight off spoon again
""
46 minutes ago
Yobz replied to Yobz's discussion 2026 Disrupter Rule - Why wasn't this a penalty to the Eels?
"If the purpose of the rule is to not have "one hand interfering with the opposition player", it should be worded as such."
58 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Yobz's discussion 2026 Disrupter Rule - Why wasn't this a penalty to the Eels?
"1. The rule is dumb and incredibly vague.
2. It's a coin toss decision
3. According to The Bunker in this game, basically making it look like you're going to go with 2 hands is good enough.
Can't wait for this stupid rule to ruin a rep/finals game."
1 hour ago
More…