If son of the goose had 17th man bench spot would brad arthur activate the 17th man? I'm starting to wonder.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"And that Mongolian would be Lomax's sensible response at court to help his case."
"who would of course grow up to be rapacious capitalists who don't give a fig about civil rights or a non-polluted planet were it not for THE TEACHERS!!....and there's the rub."
"Very well done by your friend.
Great gift."
Great gift."
Replies
You can seek your answer if you look at last years games mate. He sat the kid on the bench and didn't use him.
I'd start with his poor team selection (Simonsson & Waqa), compounded by shit rotation. Clearly Hodgson is struggling for 80 minutes, too tired to make any impact in attack. Need a back up hooker on the bench to give him a breather.
Dylan Brown hasn't been himself since he signed that 20 years contract. If it wasn't for Hopgood, we'd be f*cked.
Why pick a front rower (Grieg ) and not play him?
It's a head scratcher mate.
Zero sense that you want to take on all comers and only use 16, sometimes 15 players.
The blokes seriously lacking chromosomes.
Hahahaha I feel sorry for Greig. Disgraceful coaching!
Why has any sports journalist ask him the question as to why he plays a 3 man bench.. They are Fake News
Yes, you would think he would use him to replace Gutho when he went off. Moses to 1
Honestly, if you are going in with 16 players, why not have the 17th as a winger, or a specialist position?
Put Dunster on the bench, could've pissed off Simonsson or Blake, have Rein on there even to spell Hodgson for a little bit. Rather that than losing Moses, Brown or Hodgson and twiddling our thumbs as we have no cover. Let either Greig or Makatoa at least play Cup.
Ik so Greig goes this week without playin Cup or NRL.
I don't get it.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next