You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"The long term option at 6 is Lorenzo? "
"HFK, If I'm wrong about Pezet & he turns out to be a complete lemon, so be it. We all get things wrong, make mistakes, make false assumptions.
What kind of six is Ryles after? Dunno. But Pezet appears to have footy IQ with swagger, a kicking game,…"
What kind of six is Ryles after? Dunno. But Pezet appears to have footy IQ with swagger, a kicking game,…"
"Whether there is a definitive answer or not, it'll have nothing to do with us signing Pezet. He was only available for 2026. He had already signed with the Broncos long term from 2027."
"I have been highly critical of the decision and have copped a little blow back for it, let's see in 12 months time with the eels heading into the 2027 season if they don't have a definitive answer on who will be our long term 6 if the people…"
Replies
Sutton once again was the Donkey's best player, Dogs didn't get one penalty all second half.
I guess technically by the letter of the law that is a penalty, however that means there would have to be a penalty for players deviating and blocking runners on pretty much every kick chase every game. All we ask for is consistency, yet we never get it.
Correct
Well that should put a hole in the whole 'dogs get favourable treatment because Greenberg' theory.
Not really , it’s always been at the judiciary that’s been questionable . History shows they’ve gotten away lightly many times . There’s 100 threads on here with video evidence accompanied by the jury’s suspensions (or lack of ) to back up the “ theory “ .
That didn't take long.
It was a penalty, only just, but it was a penalty nonetheless. If the Dogs were good enough they would have put that game away in the last ten minutes.
It keeps a team from Qld in the mix.
Like their win over Wests its good for ratings
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next