You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Love how ryles is giving the young ones a crack"
"They have never been in a position of not getting what they want. They said when first started Ryles should just tell the board to let him go as they let him go, despite not letting him touch Storm players for 12 months, they also said the Sydney…"
"Yeah they have backs but also how often do they get Origin talent?"
"I'm sick of all the attention this bloke is getting. Go play bush footy for 3 years. End of story. You made your bed - now sleep on it..The NRL and the Storm can well and truely go get f....."
Replies
Sutton once again was the Donkey's best player, Dogs didn't get one penalty all second half.
I guess technically by the letter of the law that is a penalty, however that means there would have to be a penalty for players deviating and blocking runners on pretty much every kick chase every game. All we ask for is consistency, yet we never get it.
Correct
Well that should put a hole in the whole 'dogs get favourable treatment because Greenberg' theory.
Not really , it’s always been at the judiciary that’s been questionable . History shows they’ve gotten away lightly many times . There’s 100 threads on here with video evidence accompanied by the jury’s suspensions (or lack of ) to back up the “ theory “ .
That didn't take long.
It was a penalty, only just, but it was a penalty nonetheless. If the Dogs were good enough they would have put that game away in the last ten minutes.
It keeps a team from Qld in the mix.
Like their win over Wests its good for ratings
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next