Ando" tweak a little"?

After looking at the team line up can someone say what was tweaked? Burt and Smith were expected to take back their positions all along. Other then that what was the "tweak"? I still cannot believe Robson is halfback. Robson must be related to Ando or something.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I think 'tweak' could be a Brian Smithism.
    What you see on paper may look quite different come Monday night. Imagine the press this week if Robson or Cayless were on the bench. Not helpful reading for a team already struggling.
  • By the letter of the law, it is a tweak.... however probably not the tweak us fans were expecting.

    However... theres still time between now and Monday to "tweak" some more.
  • The best tweaking would be to drop INU - POORE AND CAYLESS NOW THATS TWEAKING ,
  • I still dont think we should drop Inu. Relative to the teams form, I would still keep him there.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
""
40 minutes ago
Muttman replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"Everywhere Gus goes he eventually overstays his welcome. It happened at the Roosters, at Penrith and it's happening again at the Dogs. However everywhere he goes that club does have Premiership success......after they fire Gus. He does a lot of…"
49 minutes ago
Avon Barksdale replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"The kennels having a meltdown "
54 minutes ago
HKF replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"We didn't dodge a bullet at all, we missed out on a talent that made the wrong decision to go to a team that didn't suit his learning curve. 
Galvin has the talent to be a top level half, 6 and 7, what he doesn't have at the bulldogs is the time to…"
56 minutes ago
More…